Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33141869›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Safety profile of biologic drugs for psoriasis in clinical practice: An Italian prospective pharmacovigilance study.

Luigi Francesco Iannone, Luigi Bennardo, Caterina Palleria, Roberta Roberti, Caterina De Sarro, Maria Diana Naturale, Stefano Dastoli, Luca Donato, Antonia Manti, Giancarlo Valenti and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Review of the Safety of Interleukin-17A Inhibitor Secukinumab.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Advances of Genomic Medicine in Psoriatic Arthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Luigi Francesco IannoneScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Luigi BennardoScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Caterina PalleriaScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Roberta RobertiScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Caterina De SarroScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Diana NaturaleScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Stefano DastoliScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Luca DonatoDermatology Outpatient Clinic, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale Crotone, Crotone, Italy.
Antonia MantiScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giancarlo ValentiDivision of Dermatology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
Domenico D'AmicoDivision of Dermatology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
Santo D'AttolaDermatologic Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Adele Emanuela De FrancescoUOC Pharmacy, "Mater domini" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
Vincenzo BoscoScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Eugenio Donato Di PaolaScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Steven Paul NisticòScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Rita CitraroScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Emilio RussoScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giovambattista De SarroScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio · ITAzienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitario Mater Domini · ITIstituto S.Anna Crotone · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriasis is an inflammatory and chronic skin disorder associated with physical and psychological burden impairing patients' quality of life. In the last decade, biologic drugs have widely changed treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis and their number is increasing overtime. To early identify expected/unexpected adverse events (AEs) with biologic treatments, pharmacovigilance programs are needed. We designed a post-marketing active pharmacovigilance program to monitor and analyse AEs and/or serious adverse events (SAEs) reports. All consecutive patients treated with one biologic drug during a two-years period and satisfying inclusion criteria have been enrolled in five Dermatology tertiary units. Demographic and clinical features of patients, type of treatment used, therapy discontinuation, failures, switch/swap to another biologic, and possible onset of AEs were collected. Overall, 512 patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis (286; 55.9%) or arthropathic psoriasis (226; 44.1%) have been enrolled. Eighty-two (16%) patients with AEs and 5 (1%) with SAEs have been identified. Further, 59 (11.5%) had a primary/secondary failure (mainly on infliximab and etanercept). The adverse events and SAEs were reported with golimumab (4/12), adalimumab (32/167), infliximab (9/48), etanercept (31/175) and ustekinumab (11/73), no adverse events have occurred with secukinumab (0/37). Infliximab and etanercept were significantly associated with primary/secondary failures, whereas no differences have been highlighted for AEs insurgence. On the other hand, ustekinumab seems to be associated with a low rate of AEs (p = 0.01) and no adverse events or failures have been reported with secukinumab (p = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). Our study, even though limited by a small sample size and a brief follow-up period, provide useful data on widely used biologic drugs and their tolerability, discontinuation rate and the incurrence of severe adverse events. Further studies are necessary to include the recently approved biologic drugs and to increase the sample size for more detailed analysis.

Indexed as

AdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedBiological ProductsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPharmacovigilanceProspective StudiesPsoriasisQuality of LifeBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID33141869
PMCPMC7608898
OpenAlexW3096777956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.