Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33141825›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Chest computed tomography outcomes in a randomized clinical trial in cystic fibrosis: Lessons learned from the first ataluren phase 3 study.

Harm A W M Tiddens, Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou, Joe McIntosh, J Stuart Elborn, Eitan Kerem, Nynke Bouma, Jochem Bosch, Mariette Kemner-van de Corput

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Quantification of Proteus syndrome-associated lung disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Harm A W M TiddensDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5628-6667
Eleni-Rosalina AndrinopoulouDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joe McIntoshAruvant Biotech, New York, NY, United States of America.
J Stuart ElbornCentre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Eitan KeremDepartment of Pediatrics and CF Center, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Nynke BoumaDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jochem BoschDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mariette Kemner-van de CorputDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLHadassah Medical Center · ILQueen's University Belfast · GBRoivant Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A phase 3 randomized double blind controlled, trial in 238 people with cystic fibrosis (CF) and at least one nonsense mutation (nmCF) investigated the effect of ataluren on FEV1. The study was of 48 weeks duration and failed to meet its primary endpoint. Unexpectedly, while FEV1 declined, chest computed tomography (CT) scores using the Brody-II score as secondary outcome measures did not show progression in the placebo group. Based on this observation it was concluded that the role of CT scans in CF randomized clinical trials was limited. However, more sensitive scoring systems were developed over the last decade warranting a reanalysis of this unique dataset. The aim of our study was to reanalyse all chest CT scans, obtained in the ataluren phase 3 study, using 2 independent scoring systems to characterize structural lung disease in this cohort and to compare progression of structural lung disease over the 48 weeks between treatment arms. 391 study CT scans from 210 patients were reanalysed in random order by 2 independent observers using the CF-CT and Perth-Rotterdam Annotated Grid Morphometric Analysis for CF (PRAGMA-CF) scoring systems. CF-CT and PRAGMA-CF subscores were expressed as %maximal score and %total lung volume, respectively. PRAGMA-CF subscores %Disease (p = 0.008) and %Mucus Plugging (p = 0.029) progressed over 48 weeks. CF-CT subscores did not show progression. There was no difference in progression of structural lung disease between treatment arm and placebo independent of tobramycin use. PRAGMA-CF Chest CT scores can be used as an outcome measure to study the effect of potential disease modifying drugs in CF on lung structure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCystic FibrosisDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLinear ModelsMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareOxadiazolesThoraxTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultatalurenOxadiazoles

Identifiers

PMID33141825
PMCPMC7608929
OpenAlexW3096219925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.