ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2020
Accounting for One Health: Insights from the social sciences.
Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parasitology at the heart of the "One Health" concept: a longstanding alliance illustrated by cysticercosis control.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2026Review
- Where exactly do the social and behavioural sciences fit in One Health?Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Advancing one health: Embracing complexity and interdisciplinary collaboration.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- What does One Health want? Feminist, posthuman, and anti-colonial possibilities.One health outlook · 2023Article
- The emergence of the Biodiversity/Health nexus: making biodiversity a health issue.Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies · 2023Article
- Context matters: Leveraging anthropology within one health.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Social insights on the implementation of One Health in zoonosis prevention and control: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2022Article
- One Health: A social science discussion of a global agenda.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2022Article
- Social Sciences in One Health: Insights From Multiple Worlds Perspectives on the Dam Rupture in Brumadinho-Brazil.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper discusses the relationship between One Health (OH) and the social sciences. Using a comparison between three narratives of the history of OH, it is argued that OH can be studied as a social phenomenon. The narrative of OH by its promoters (folk narratives) emphasizes two dimensions: OH as a renewal of veterinary medicine and OH as an institutional response to global health crises. Narratives from empirical social science work explore similar dimensions, but make them more complex. For political sociology, OH is the result of negotiations between the three international organisations (WHO, OIE and FAO), in a context of a global health crisis, which led to the reconfiguration of their respective mandates and scope of action: OH is a response to an institutional crisis. For the sociology of science, OH testifies to the evolution of the profession and veterinary science, enabling it to position itself as a promoter of interdisciplinarity, in a context of convergence between research and policy. In the Discussion section, I propose an approach to OH as an "epistemic watchword": a concept whose objective is to make several actors work together (watchword), in a particular direction, that of the production of knowledge (epistemic).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.