Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2020
Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT.
Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Cultural, Religious and Socio-Ethical Misconceptions among Muslim Women towards Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial.The Lancet. Oncology · 2020Trial
- Optimising Investment in Health Innovations in Europe.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
- Underserved Latinas' Perceptions and Implications Around Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Analysing Breast Cancer Screening Trends in Rural Saudi Arabia: Vision 2030 Context.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Extension of the mammographic screening programme in Italy: cost-benefit analysis of early diagnosis in the 45-49 and 70-74 age groups.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence of mammography screening from the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Registry: a cost minimisation analysis of 15 144 patients with breast cancer.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL) in women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer: An updated joint position statement of the IOF, CABS, ECTS, IEG, ESCEO, IMS, and SIOG.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- Adherence to breast screening guidelines and breast cancer mortality: a population cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Article
- Personalized screening based on risk and density: prevalence data from the RIBBS study.La Radiologia medica · 2025Observational
- Sentiment Analysis of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- Updates in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Awareness of skin cancer screening coverage in U.S. healthcare plans: Is there a need to better educate the public?Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Investigating harms of testing for ovarian cancer - psychological outcomes and cancer conversion rates in women with symptoms of ovarian cancer: A cohort study embedded in the multicentre ROCkeTS prospective diagnostic study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere remains disagreement on the long-term effect of mammographic screening in women aged 40-49 years.
objectivesThe long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial that offered annual mammography to women aged 40-49 years. The estimation of the effect of these mammograms on breast cancer and other-cause mortality, and the effect on incidence, with implications for overdiagnosis.
designAn individually randomised controlled trial comparing offering annual mammography with offering usual care in those aged 40-48 years, and thus evaluating the effect of annual screening entirely taking place before the age of 50 years. There was follow-up for an average of 23 years for breast cancer incidence, breast cancer death and death from other causes. We analysed the mortality and incidence data by Poisson regression and estimated overdiagnosis formally using Markov process models.
settingTwenty-three screening units in England, Wales and Scotland within the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
participantsWomen aged 39-41 years were recruited between 1990 and 1997. After exclusions, a total of 53,883 women were randomised to undergo screening (the intervention group) and 106,953 women were randomised to have usual care (the control group).
interventionsThe intervention group was invited to an annual breast screen with film mammography, two view at first screen and single view thereafter, up to and including the calendar year of their 48th birthday. The control group received no intervention. Both groups were invited to the National Programme from the age of 50 years, when screening is offered to all women in the UK.
main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase of the trial (i.e. before the first National Programme screen at 50 years), mortality from all breast cancers diagnosed after randomisation, all-cause mortality, mortality from causes other than breast cancer, and the incidence of breast cancer.
resultsThere was a statistically significant 25% reduction in mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase at 10 years' follow-up (relative rate 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97; LIMITATIONS: There was 31% average non-compliance with screening and three centres had to cease screening for resource and capacity reasons.
conclusionsAnnual mammographic screening at the age of 40-49 years resulted in a relative reduction in mortality, which was attenuated after 10 years. It is likely that digital mammography with two views at all screens, as practised now, could improve this further. There was no evidence of overdiagnosis in addition to that which already results from the National Programme carried out at later ages. FUTURE WORK: There is a need for research on the effects of modern mammographic protocols and additional imaging in this age group.
trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN24647151.
fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.