Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33141508›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2020

A Deep Learning Pipeline for Nucleus Segmentation.

George Zaki, Prabhakar R Gudla, Kyunghun Lee, Justin Kim, Laurent Ozbun, Sigal Shachar, Manasi Gadkari, Jing Sun, Iain D C Fraser, Luis M Franco and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

George Zaki *Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR), Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Prabhakar R Gudla *High-Throughput Imaging Facility (HiTIF), Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kyunghun LeeHigh-Throughput Imaging Facility (HiTIF), Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Justin KimBiomedical Informatics and Data Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR), Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Laurent OzbunHigh-Throughput Imaging Facility (HiTIF), Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sigal ShacharCell Biology of Genomes (CBGE), Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Manasi GadkariSystemic Autoimmunity Branch, NIAMS/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jing SunLaboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Iain D C FraserLaboratory of Immune System Biology, NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Luis M FrancoSystemic Autoimmunity Branch, NIAMS/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tom MisteliCell Biology of Genomes (CBGE), Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Gianluca PegoraroHigh-Throughput Imaging Facility (HiTIF), Center for Cancer Research (CCR), NCI/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2843-9464

Funding

HiTIF Microscopy Core FacilityZICBC011567 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PEGORARO, GIANLUCA · 2014 to 2025
$15.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC011567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is rapidly becoming the technique of choice for automated segmentation of nuclei in biological image analysis workflows. In order to evaluate the feasibility of training nuclear segmentation models on small, custom annotated image datasets that have been augmented, we have designed a computational pipeline to systematically compare different nuclear segmentation model architectures and model training strategies. Using this approach, we demonstrate that transfer learning and tuning of training parameters, such as the composition, size, and preprocessing of the training image dataset, can lead to robust nuclear segmentation models, which match, and often exceed, the performance of existing, off-the-shelf deep learning models pretrained on large image datasets. We envision a practical scenario where deep learning nuclear segmentation models trained in this way can be shared across a laboratory, facility, or institution, and continuously improved by training them on progressively larger and varied image datasets. Our work provides computational tools and a practical framework for deep learning-based biological image segmentation using small annotated image datasets. Published [2020]. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Deep LearningCell NucleusImage Processing, Computer-Assisteddeep learningfluorescence microscopyhigh-content imagingmachine learningnucleus segmentation

Identifiers

PMID33141508
PMCPMC8914348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.