ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2020
A Deep Learning Pipeline for Nucleus Segmentation.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examination of new clinical dental caries in school children using real intra oral photos with artificial intelligence model YOLO-V8x.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- High-throughput image processing software for the study of nuclear architecture and gene expression.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Segmentation of Variants of Nuclei on Whole Slide Images by Using Radiomic Features.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Must-have Qualities of Clinical Research on Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningBalkan medical journal · 2023Review
- Scellseg: A style-aware deep learning tool for adaptive cell instance segmentation by contrastive fine-tuning.iScience · 2022Article
- Benchmarking of deep learning algorithms for 3D instance segmentation of confocal image datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2022Review
- Towards a better understanding of annotation tools for medical imaging: a survey.Multimedia tools and applications · 2022Article
- Digital Image Analysis Tools Developed by the Indiana O'Brien Center.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning is rapidly becoming the technique of choice for automated segmentation of nuclei in biological image analysis workflows. In order to evaluate the feasibility of training nuclear segmentation models on small, custom annotated image datasets that have been augmented, we have designed a computational pipeline to systematically compare different nuclear segmentation model architectures and model training strategies. Using this approach, we demonstrate that transfer learning and tuning of training parameters, such as the composition, size, and preprocessing of the training image dataset, can lead to robust nuclear segmentation models, which match, and often exceed, the performance of existing, off-the-shelf deep learning models pretrained on large image datasets. We envision a practical scenario where deep learning nuclear segmentation models trained in this way can be shared across a laboratory, facility, or institution, and continuously improved by training them on progressively larger and varied image datasets. Our work provides computational tools and a practical framework for deep learning-based biological image segmentation using small annotated image datasets. Published [2020]. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.