Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33141402›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2021

New Zealand Religious Community Responses to COVID-19 While Under Level 4 Lockdown.

Theis Oxholm, Catherine Rivera, Kearly Schirrman, William James Hoverd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Religious practice in the pandemic of COVID-19 and the nursing diagnoses.International journal of nursing knowledge · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mosques in Japan responding to COVID-19 pandemic: Infection prevention and support provision.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theis OxholmReligion and Culture, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-4673
Catherine RiveraSchool of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-5789
Kearly SchirrmanMassey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
William James HoverdSchool of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand. w.hoverd@massey.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-2599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social scientific research into the impact of COVID-19 on religious communities is emergent. This research combines interview data (n = 12) collected, as New Zealand moved into Level 3-Restrict and then Level 4-Lockdown, with Facebook and online news media analysis to understand how religious leaders and their communities responded to COVID-19. Our data found four challenges: (1) The requirement to reassess worship practices, (2) the need to mitigate any potential for community transmission, (3) significant difficulties related to social distancing for communal religious practices, and lastly, (4) welfare and pastoral concerns for congregations and others in need.

Indexed as

COVID-19QuarantineReligionHumansNew ZealandCOVID-19LockdownNew ZealandReligionSocial distancing

Identifiers

PMID33141402
PMCPMC7606061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.