Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33141326›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2020

Contextual determinants of intimate partner violence: a multi-level analysis in six European cities.

Nicole Geovana Dias, Silvia Fraga, Joaquim Soares, Eleni Hatzidimitriadou, Elisabeth Ioannidi-Kapolou, Jutta Lindert, Örjan Sundin, Olga Toth, Henrique Barros, Ana Isabel Ribeiro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicole Geovana DiasEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
Silvia FragaEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
Joaquim SoaresEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
Eleni HatzidimitriadouFaculty of Health and Wellbeing, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.
Elisabeth Ioannidi-KapolouDepartment of Sociology, National School of Public Health Athens, Athens, Greece.
Jutta LindertUniversity of Applied Sciences Emden, Emden, Germany.
Örjan SundinDepartment of Psychology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Olga TothInstitute of Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Henrique BarrosEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Isabel RibeiroEPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas nº 135, 4050-600, Porto, Portugal. ana.isabel.ribeiro@ispup.up.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-6962

Funding

European Comission 20081310Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/01516/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/02386/2018Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006862Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/DTP/04750/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess whether city-level characteristics influence the risk of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization across six European cities.

methodsThe DOVE study included 3496 participants from Athens-Greece, Budapest-Hungary, London-UK, Östersund-Sweden, Porto-Portugal and Stuttgart-Germany. IPV victimization was assessed using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and several contextual variables were included: GINI coefficient, gender equality index, an index of social support, unemployment rate and proportion of residents with tertiary education. Multilevel models were fitted to estimate the associations (odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals) between each type of victimization and contextual and individual-level variables.

results62.3% of the participants reported being a victim of IPV during the previous year, with large between-city differences (53.9%-72.4%). Contextual variables accounted for a substantial amount of this heterogeneity. Unemployment rates were associated with psychological (1.05, 1.01-1.08) and physical IPV (1.07, 1.01-1.13). GINI coefficient showed a positive association with any form of IPV (1.06, 1.01-1.11) and sexual coercion (1.13, 1.01-1.25).

conclusionsWe found significant associations between contextual determinants and IPV, which emphasizes the importance of considering contextual socioeconomic conditions when policy measures are designed to address IPV.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCitiesCrime VictimsCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusEuropeFemaleGender RoleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioSocial SupportSocioeconomic FactorsInequalitiesIntimate partner violenceMultilevel analysisSocial supportSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.