ArticleProtoplasma2021
Pollen wall development in Hydrangea bretschneiderii Dippel. (Hydrangeaceae): advanced interpretation through physical input, with in vitro experimental verification.
Article in Protoplasma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to unravel the underlying mechanisms of pollen wall development in Hydrangea bretschneiderii. For this, we tested our hypothesis that distinct physical processes, phase separation and micellar self-assembly, underpinned exine development by taking the substances, determined by the genome, through several phase transitions. We traced each developmental stage with TEM; then, we obtained in vitro simulations corresponding to those stages. The main steps of exine ontogeny observed in the microspore periplasmic space were initiated with phase separation, resulting in the conversion of homogeneous contents to heterogeneous two-layered state of the material. After each step of phase, separation self-assembly picked up the initiative and took the substances through the sequence of micellar mesophases which were the base for all the exine structures. These mesophases are as follows: spherical micelles, transforming first into columns, and then to cylindrical micelles which turn to columellae after initial sporopollenin accumulation. The tectum appeared along the interface of the phase separated material. After the tetrad disintegration and the next phase separation, laminate mesophase appeared being the base for the endexine lamellae. Then, a new step of phase separation at aperture sites brought the appearance of a granular endexine layer; the latter became intermixed finally with lamellae. This gives, together with experimental simulation, strong evidence that the genome "shifts a part of work" on exine formation onto physical processes, and the latter are an inherent mechanism of evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.