Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33141299›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

The prevalence and locations of bone metastases using whole-body MRI in treatment-naïve intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

Fredrik Ottosson, Eduard Baco, Peter M Lauritzen, Erik Rud

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management of bone metastasis in prostate cancer.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fredrik OttossonDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Aker, Oslo, Norway.
Eduard BacoDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Aker, Oslo, Norway.
Peter M LauritzenDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Aker, Oslo, Norway.
Erik RudDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Aker, Postboks 4959, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. erik.rud@ous.hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-2519
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of bone metastases in treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients eligible for a metastatic workup using whole-body MRI, and to evaluate the results in light of current guidelines.

methodsThis single-institution, retrospective study included all patients with treatment-naïve prostate cancer referred to whole-body MRI during 2016 and 2017. All were eligible for a metastatic workup according to the guidelines: PSA > 20 ng/ml and/or Gleason grade group ≥ 3 and/or cT ≥ 2c and/or bone symptoms. The definition of a metastasis was descriptive and based on the original MRI reports. The anatomical location of metastases was registered.

resultsWe included 161 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer of which 36 (22%) were intermediate-risk and 125 (78%) were high-risk. The median age and PSA were 71 years (IQR 64-76) and 13 ng/ml (IQR 8-28), respectively. Bone metastases were found in 12 patients (7%, 95% CI: 4-13), and all were high-risk with Gleason grade group ≥ 4. The pelvis was affected in 4 patients, and the spine + pelvis in the remaining 8. No patients demonstrated metastases to the spine without concomitant metastases in the pelvis. Limitations are the small number of metastases and retrospective design.

conclusionThis study suggests that the overall prevalence of bone metastases using the current guidelines for screening is quite low. No metastases were seen in the case of Gleason grade group ≤ 3, and further studies should investigate if it necessary to screen non-high-risk patients. KEY POINTS: • The overall prevalence of bone metastases was 7% in the case of newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. • The prevalence in high-risk patients was 10%, and no metastases were seen in patients with Gleason grade group ≤ 3. • The pelvic skeleton is the main site, and no metastases occurred in the spine without concomitant pelvic metastases.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrevalenceProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasms metastasesProstatic neoplasmRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33141299
PMCPMC8043928
OpenAlexW3095938770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.