Trial reportJAMA2020
Effect of an Online Weight Management Program Integrated With Population Health Management on Weight Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02656693 (Integrating Online Weight Management With Primary Care Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Integrating Online Weight Management With Primary Care Support: Patient-Centered Strategies for Addressing Overweight and Obesity in Primary Care
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of smartphone applications targeting eating behaviour for weight loss.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- The effects of multimodal lifestyle interventions on blood pressure, body weight, and waist circumference in hypertensive patients: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Automated lifestyle interventions and weight loss: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of weight management interventions for adults delivered in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Strategies for Nutritional Therapy for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and/or Hypertension in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of the use of dietary self-monitoring in behavioural weight loss interventions: delivery, intensity and effectiveness.Public health nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- A cluster-randomized controlled trial of automated internet weight-loss programs in primary care: Role of automated provider feedback.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2022Trial
- Effects of a Dietitian-Led, Telehealth Lifestyle Intervention on Blood Pressure: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Engagement and Weight Change in an Online Weight Management Program in Clinical Settings: An Implementation Project.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- A Remote Program for Navigator- and Pharmacist-Led Management of Obesity Medications in Adults: Rationale, Design, and Implementation.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- A Digital Diabetes Prevention Program for Hispanic Adolescents (Fit24+): Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Analysis of morbid obese diabetic and non-diabetic patients: clinical and social characteristics, habits and workup to undergo bariatric surgery in Lombardy, Italy.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of remote monitoring for patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease: a 12-month matched cohort study in primary care.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Variability in body weight and body composition and cognitive trajectories in older adults in the United States.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Article
- Lifestyle Change Interventions: Effectiveness of REWIND, a Virtual, Community-Based Weight Management Program.Obesity science & practice · 2025Article
- Tailoring remote patient management to optimise cardiovascular risk management in primary care: a mixed-methods implementation study informing large-scale implementation.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Impacts of Behavioral Compliance on Weight-Loss and Metabolic Profile in a Smartphone App-Based Lifestyle Intervention or Plus Dietitian Supporting: A Randomized and Controlled Trial Among Chinese.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Methodological approaches and author-reported limitations in evaluation studies of digital health technologies (DHT): A scoping review of DHT interventions for cancer, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Online programs may help with weight loss but have not been widely implemented in routine primary care. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a combined intervention, including an online weight management program plus population health management, with the online program only and with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized trial with enrollment from July 19, 2016, through August 10, 2017, at 15 primary care practices in the US. Eligible participants had a scheduled primary care visit and were aged 20 to 70 years, had a body mass index between 27 and less than 40, and had a diagnosis of hypertension or type 2 diabetes. Follow-up ended on May 8, 2019. Interventions: Participants in the usual care group (n = 326) were mailed general information about weight management. Participants in the online program only group (n = 216) and the combined intervention group (n = 298) were registered for the online program. The participants in the combined intervention group also received weight-related population health management, which included additional support from nonclinical staff who monitored their progress in the online program and conducted periodic outreach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months based on measured weights recorded in the electronic health record. Weight change at 18 months was a secondary outcome. Results: Among the 840 participants who enrolled (mean age, 59.3 years [SD, 8.6 years]; 60% female; 76.8% White), 732 (87.1%) had a recorded weight at 12 months and the missing weights for the remaining participants were imputed. There was a significant difference in weight change at 12 months by group with a mean weight change of -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.1 to -0.3 kg) in the usual care group, -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.6 to -1.1 kg) in the online program only group, and -3.1 kg (95% CI, -3.7 to -2.5 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). The difference in weight change between the combined intervention group and the usual care group was -1.9 kg (97.5% CI, -2.9 to -0.9 kg; P < .001) and the difference between the combined intervention group and the online program only group was -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.2 to -0.3 kg; P = .01). At 18 months, the mean weight change was -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.8 to -1.0 kg) in the usual care group, -1.1 kg (95% CI, -2.0 to -0.3 kg) in the online program only group, and -2.8 kg (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.0 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among primary care patients with overweight or obesity and hypertension or type 2 diabetes, combining population health management with an online program resulted in a small but statistically significant greater weight loss at 12 months compared with usual care or the online program only. Further research is needed to understand the generalizability, scalability, and durability of these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02656693.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.