ReviewJournal of vision2020
A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.
Review in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Pooled it
- Can the visual system explicitly represent distributions of emotional expressions?Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Filling-in of the foveal rod scotoma and confidence preference for central vision under mesopic viewing conditions.Vision research · 2026Article
- During natural vision, semantic novelty modulates fixation-related processing in primate cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Saccade-synchronized alpha rhythms predict strength of memory trace of stimulus orientation.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Relating the perceived useful field of view to visual search in 2D Images and 3D volumetric images.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Guiding gaze via gaze: Effect anticipation during intentional saccadic gaze leading.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Predicting what and when across saccades: Evidence from the extrafoveal preview effect.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Article
- Serial dependence is stronger for peripheral than for central vision.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Eye movements do not preferentially test inferences in the blind spot.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The similarity with a face presented in central vision improves face recognition in peripheral vision.Perception · 2025Article
- The psychophysics of dynamic gaze-following saccades during search.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal Evidence Accumulation Through Saccadic Sampling for Object Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effects of Oculomotor Scanning on Agility Performance: Gender and a Type of Team Sport Comparison.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Eye movements during gaze perception.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Keeping your eye, head, and hand on the ball: Rapidly orchestrated visuomotor behavior in a continuous action task.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Perceptual organization is limited in peripheral vision: Evidence from configural superiority.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Chromatic and achromatic contrast sensitivity in the far periphery.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- EPCNet: Implementing an 'Artificial Fovea' for More Efficient Monitoring Using the Sensor Fusion of an Event-Based and a Frame-Based Camera.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual processing varies dramatically across the visual field. These differences start in the retina and continue all the way to the visual cortex. Despite these differences in processing, the perceptual experience of humans is remarkably stable and continuous across the visual field. Research in the last decade has shown that processing in peripheral and foveal vision is not independent, but is more directly connected than previously thought. We address three core questions on how peripheral and foveal vision interact, and review recent findings on potentially related phenomena that could provide answers to these questions. First, how is the processing of peripheral and foveal signals related during fixation? Peripheral signals seem to be processed in foveal retinotopic areas to facilitate peripheral object recognition, and foveal information seems to be extrapolated toward the periphery to generate a homogeneous representation of the environment. Second, how are peripheral and foveal signals re-calibrated? Transsaccadic changes in object features lead to a reduction in the discrepancy between peripheral and foveal appearance. Third, how is peripheral and foveal information stitched together across saccades? Peripheral and foveal signals are integrated across saccadic eye movements to average percepts and to reduce uncertainty. Together, these findings illustrate that peripheral and foveal processing are closely connected, mastering the compromise between a large peripheral visual field and high resolution at the fovea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.