Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140902›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats.

Maggie C Buller, Lynelle R Johnson, Catherine A Outerbridge, William Vernau, Stephen D White

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maggie C BullerWilliam R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
Lynelle R JohnsonDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-5626
Catherine A OuterbridgeDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
William VernauDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of California School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
Stephen D WhiteDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
University of California, Davis · USVeterinary Medical Teaching Hospital · US

Funding

Bailey Wrigley Fund, University of California, Davis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases.

objectiveTo examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia. ANIMALS: Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats.

methodsProspective, case-control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores >300 considered positive.

resultsCats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.

Indexed as

AsthmaCat DiseasesEosinophiliaAllergensAnimalsCase-Control StudiesCatsImmunoglobulin EProspective StudiesAllergensImmunoglobulin EasthmabronchitisbronchoscopyELISAimmunology

Identifiers

PMID33140902
PMCPMC7694819
OpenAlexW3095094640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.