ArticleFamily practice2021
An estimation of patients at potential risk for drug-induced sexual dysfunction using pharmacy dispensing data.
Article in Family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adverse Drug Reactions and Drug Interactions in Multimorbid Patients: A Review of Current Evidence.Cureus · 2025Review
- Surgical and non-surgical predictors of long term erectile function after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- First insights into the current practice, knowledge, and attitudes of community pharmacists regarding sexual adverse drug reactions: a cross-sectional survey.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Drug-Induced Sexual Dysfunction: An Analysis of Reports to a National Pharmacovigilance Database.Drug safety · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAdverse drug reactions on sexual functioning (sADRs) may seriously decrease a person's quality of life. A multitude of diseases and drugs are known risk factors for sexual dysfunction. To inform patients better about these potential effects, more insight is needed on the estimated number of patients at high risk for sADRs and their characteristics.
methodsThis cross-sectional study estimated the number of patients in the Netherlands who were dispensed drugs with a potential very high risk (>10%) or high risk (1-10%) for sADRs as registered in the Summary of Product Characteristics, the official drug information text in Europe.
resultsIn April 2019, 2.06% of the inhabitants of the Netherlands received drugs with >10% risk for sADRs and 7.76% with 1-10% risk. The majority of these patients had at least one additional risk factor for decreased sexual function such as high age or depression. Almost half of the patients were identified with two or more morbidities influencing sexual functioning. Paroxetine, sertraline and spironolactone were the most dispensed drugs with a potential >10% risk for sADRs. One-third of their first dispenses were not followed by a second dispense, with a higher risk of discontinuation for a decreasing number of morbidities.
conclusionAbout 1 in 11 inhabitants of the Netherlands was dispensed a drug with a potential high risk for sADRs, often with other risk factors for sexual complaints. Further research is needed whether these users actually experience sADRs, to understand its impact on multimorbid patients and to provide alternatives if needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.