Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140634›Full record

ReviewChemical research in toxicology2021

The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology.

Ann M Richard, Ruili Huang, Suramya Waidyanatha, Paul Shinn, Bradley J Collins, Inthirany Thillainadarajah, Christopher M Grulke, Antony J Williams, Ryan R Lougee, Richard S Judson and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical research in toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multimodal Cross-Attentive Graph-Based Framework for Predicting In Vivo Endocrine Disruptors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann M RichardCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2116-2300
Ruili HuangNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Suramya WaidyanathaDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Paul ShinnNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Bradley J CollinsDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Inthirany ThillainadarajahSenior Environmental Employment Program, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Christopher M GrulkeCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Antony J WilliamsCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-4821
Ryan R LougeeCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Richard S JudsonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Keith A HouckCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0055-2249
Mahmoud ShobairCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Chihae YangAltamira, LLC, Columbus, Ohio 43235, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2529-866X
James F RathmanAltamira, LLC, Columbus, Ohio 43235, United States.
Adam YasgarNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-1402
Suzanne C FitzpatrickCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland 20740, United States.
Anton SimeonovNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Russell S ThomasCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2340-0301
Kevin M CroftonCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Richard S PaulesDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
John R BucherDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Christopher P AustinNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States.
Robert J KavlockCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Raymond R TiceDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Environmental Protection Agency · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USNational Institutes of Health · USMolecular Networks (Germany) · DECenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · US

Funding

Research Services Section (RSS)ZICTR000242 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI WILSON, KELLI · 2015 to 2025
$64.9M
Toxicological Assessments for the Division of the National Toxicology ProgramZICES103316 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2020 to 2021
$18.5M
Toxicology in the 21st Century Program (Tox21) - Computational ToxicologyZIATR000040 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI HUANG, RUILI · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2009, the Tox21 project has screened ∼8500 chemicals in more than 70 high-throughput assays, generating upward of 100 million data points, with all data publicly available through partner websites at the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and National Toxicology Program (NTP). Underpinning this public effort is the largest compound library ever constructed specifically for improving understanding of the chemical basis of toxicity across research and regulatory domains. Each Tox21 federal partner brought specialized resources and capabilities to the partnership, including three approximately equal-sized compound libraries. All Tox21 data generated to date have resulted from a confluence of ideas, technologies, and expertise used to design, screen, and analyze the Tox21 10K library. The different programmatic objectives of the partners led to three distinct, overlapping compound libraries that, when combined, not only covered a diversity of chemical structures, use-categories, and properties but also incorporated many types of compound replicates. The history of development of the Tox21 "10K" chemical library and data workflows implemented to ensure quality chemical annotations and allow for various reproducibility assessments are described. Cheminformatics profiling demonstrates how the three partner libraries complement one another to expand the reach of each individual library, as reflected in coverage of regulatory lists, predicted toxicity end points, and physicochemical properties. ToxPrint chemotypes (CTs) and enrichment approaches further demonstrate how the combined partner libraries amplify structure-activity patterns that would otherwise not be detected. Finally, CT enrichments are used to probe global patterns of activity in combined ToxCast and Tox21 activity data sets relative to test-set size and chemical versus biological end point diversity, illustrating the power of CT approaches to discern patterns in chemical-activity data sets. These results support a central premise of the Tox21 program: A collaborative merging of programmatically distinct compound libraries would yield greater rewards than could be achieved separately.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansSmall Molecule LibrariesUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencySmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID33140634
PMCPMC7887805
OpenAlexW3097280976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.