ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2022
Consensus-Based Technical Recommendations for Clinical Translation of Renal Phase Contrast MRI.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- GLP-1 Promotes Cortical and Medullary Perfusion in the Human Kidney and Maintains Renal Oxygenation During NaCl Loading.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Trial
- Prospective Study of Multiparametric Renal MRI for CKD Progression (AFiRM).Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of Splanchnic Blood Flow Measured Using Phase-Contrast MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Observational
- ASL, DTI, and T1 mapping in identifying immune and non-immune pathogenic factors of chronic allograft injury.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Intra- and interobserver variability in renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: T1 mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging, arterial spin labeling, blood oxygen level-dependent and renal artery flow measurements utilizing manual segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Glomerulonephritis through the lens of ultrasound and radiology.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Assessment of renal insufficiency in patients with renal artery stenosis by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Drivers and mechanisms of cognitive decline in chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging of renal oxygenation.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Color-map recommendation for MR relaxometry maps.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of Acute Kidney Injury using MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Quantitative body magnetic resonance imaging: how to make it work.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Physiological confounders of renal blood flow measurement.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- MRI of kidney size matters.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Contemporary and Emerging MRI Strategies for Assessing Kidney Allograft Complications: Arterial Stenosis and Parenchymal Injury, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024Review
- Article
- Renal MRI: From Nephron to NMR Signal.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinical Trials of Diabetic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Renal Assessment in Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Kidney oxygenation, perfusion and blood flow in people with and without type 1 diabetes.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhase-contrast (PC) MRI is a feasible and valid noninvasive technique to measure renal artery blood flow, showing potential to support diagnosis and monitoring of renal diseases. However, the variability in measured renal blood flow values across studies is large, most likely due to differences in PC-MRI acquisition and processing. Standardized acquisition and processing protocols are therefore needed to minimize this variability and maximize the potential of renal PC-MRI as a clinically useful tool. PURPOSE: To build technical recommendations for the acquisition, processing, and analysis of renal 2D PC-MRI data in human subjects to promote standardization of renal blood flow measurements and facilitate the comparability of results across scanners and in multicenter clinical studies. STUDY TYPE: Systematic consensus process using a modified Delphi method. POPULATION: Not applicable. SEQUENCE FIELD/STRENGTH: Renal fast gradient echo-based 2D PC-MRI. ASSESSMENT: An international panel of 27 experts from Europe, the USA, Australia, and Japan with 6 (interquartile range 4-10) years of experience in 2D PC-MRI formulated consensus statements on renal 2D PC-MRI in two rounds of surveys. Starting from a recently published systematic review article, literature-based and data-driven statements regarding patient preparation, hardware, acquisition protocol, analysis steps, and data reporting were formulated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Consensus was defined as ≥75% unanimity in response, and a clear preference was defined as 60-74% agreement among the experts.
resultsAmong 60 statements, 57 (95%) achieved consensus after the second-round survey, while the remaining three showed a clear preference. Consensus statements resulted in specific recommendations for subject preparation, 2D renal PC-MRI data acquisition, processing, and reporting. DATA
conclusionThese recommendations might promote a widespread adoption of renal PC-MRI, and may help foster the set-up of multicenter studies aimed at defining reference values and building larger and more definitive evidence, and will facilitate clinical translation of PC-MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.