Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140424›Full record

ArticleProteins2021

Simplified geometric representations of protein structures identify complementary interaction interfaces.

Caitlyn L McCafferty, Edward M Marcotte, David W Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural Biology in the Multi-Omics Era.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caitlyn L McCaffertyDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0872-4527
Edward M MarcotteDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8808-180X
David W TaylorDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6198-1194

Funding

Mapping the CPLANE interactome, an extensive protein interaction network underlying human ciliopathiesR01HD085901 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EDWARD M MARCOTTE, John B Wallingford · 2016 to 2026
$6.2M
Proteomics and model organism humanization to decode human geneticsR35GM122480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EDWARD M MARCOTTE · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
Imaging macromolecular machines in gene regulationR35GM138348 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TAYLOR, DAVID W · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Mapping the blood cell protein complexosomeR01DK110520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EMILI, ANDREW, MARCOTTE, EDWARD M · 2016 to 2018
$727k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD085901NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110520NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122480NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are critical to protein function, but three-dimensional (3D) arrangements of interacting proteins have proven hard to predict, even given the identities and 3D structures of the interacting partners. Specifically, identifying the relevant pairwise interaction surfaces remains difficult, often relying on shape complementarity with molecular docking while accounting for molecular motions to optimize rigid 3D translations and rotations. However, such approaches can be computationally expensive, and faster, less accurate approximations may prove useful for large-scale prediction and assembly of 3D structures of multi-protein complexes. We asked if a reduced representation of protein geometry retains enough information about molecular properties to predict pairwise protein interaction interfaces that are tolerant of limited structural rearrangements. Here, we describe a reduced representation of 3D protein accessible surfaces on which molecular properties such as charge, hydrophobicity, and evolutionary rate can be easily mapped, implemented in the MorphProt package. Pairs of surfaces are compared to rapidly assess partner-specific potential surface complementarity. On two available benchmarks of 185 overall known protein complexes, we observe predictions comparable to other structure-based tools at correctly identifying protein interaction surfaces. Furthermore, we examined the effect of molecular motion through normal mode simulation on a benchmark receptor-ligand pair and observed no marked loss of predictive accuracy for distortions of up to 6 Å Cα-RMSD. Thus, a shape reduction of protein surfaces retains considerable information about surface complementarity, offers enhanced speed of comparison relative to more complex geometric representations, and exhibits tolerance to conformational changes.

Indexed as

ProteinsComputational BiologyMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProteinscomputational biologyinteraction interfacesprotein structure

Identifiers

PMID33140424
PMCPMC7855953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.