ArticleCardiology journal2021
The use of the Gunning Fog Index to evaluate the readability of Polish and English drug leaflets in the context of Health Literacy challenges in Medical Linguistics: An exploratory study.
Article in Cardiology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Autistic Adolescents' Essays Using Computer Techniques.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Readability and quality assessment of AI-powered chatbot responses to overactive bladder patient questions: a comparative study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Information quality, readability, and empathy of AI-generated public mental health information: a comparative evaluation of eight large language models.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessing large language model responses to pediatric depression FAQs: a cross-sectional study on readability, accuracy, and sentiment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- The ethics of simplification: balancing patient autonomy, comprehension, and accuracy in AI-generated radiology reports.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of Large Language Model Outputs and NHS Patient Information in Oral Medicine.Cureus · 2025Article
- Co-Design of a Health Screening Program Fact Sheet by People Experiencing Homelessness and ChatGPT: Focus Group Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessing ChatGPT's ability to answer questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction: can our patients trust it?International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Preoperative Counseling for Head and Neck Cancer Surgery.The Laryngoscope · 2024Article
- Patient-Directed Vasectomy Information: How Readable Is It?The world journal of men's health · 2024Article
- Article
- Should I freeze my sperm?-readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.