Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140302›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

A comparison study of test organism species and methodologies for combined toxicity assay of copper ions and zinc ions.

Jingting He, Shuaining Ma, Ling Liu, Chang Liu, Shaojun Dong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingting HeCollege of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, People's Republic of China.
Shuaining MaState Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China.
Ling LiuState Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China. liuling@ciac.ac.cn.
Chang LiuCollege of Pharmacy, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121001, People's Republic of China. liuchang@jzmu.edu.cn.
Shaojun DongState Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The general toxicity assays for evaluating the risk of aquatic environment were commonly based on single-species test organism models. Thus, the lack and conflict of the different responses among species had hindered researchers to assess the real toxicity of a target toxicant. Therefore, the difference between the test species and their corresponding methodologies was investigated in this work and three species, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (a fish), were chosen as the test organism for typical prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and vertebrates, respectively. More specifically, we investigated (i) the individual and combined toxicity of Cu

Indexed as

CopperZincAnimalsIonsCopperIonsZincCombined toxicityElectrochemical methodEscherichia coliRisk assessmentSaccharomyces cerevisiaeToxicity assay

Identifiers

PMID33140302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.