Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140296›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021

Evaluation of guideline-based cardiovascular medications and their respective doses in heart failure patients in Oman.

Diana Arandi Hanbali, Khamis Al Hashmi, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in Palestine: Retrospective clinical audit study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diana Arandi HanbaliDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 38, Al-Khodh, PC-123, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Khamis Al HashmiDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Mohammed Al Za'abiDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 38, Al-Khodh, PC-123, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Ibrahim Al-ZakwaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 38, Al-Khodh, PC-123, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. ial_zakwani@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-4230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Significant gaps exist between guidelines and practice in the management of heart failure, not only in Oman but the Arabian Gulf region in general. Currently, only limited research exists on the use of these guideline-based cardiovascular medications and their corresponding target doses in the region. Objective To evaluate the use of guideline-based cardiovascular medications and their corresponding target doses in heart failure patients with reduced (< 40%) and mid-range (40-49%) ejection fraction in Oman. Setting Cardiology clinics at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. Methods The study included heart failure patients seen at the clinics between January 2016 and December 2019. The use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (captopril, lisinopril) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (irbesartan, valsartan), β-blockers (bisoprolol, carvedilol) and spironolactone along with their respective target doses were evaluated as per the European, American, and Canadian heart failure guidelines. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics. Main outcome measure The proportion of patients that was prescribed guideline-based heart failure medications along with their target doses as per guidelines. Results The overall mean age of the cohort (N = 249) was 63 ± 15 years and 61% (n = 151) were males. Seventy-one percent (n = 177) of the patients had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction while 29% (n = 72) had heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction. A total of 87% (n = 216), 62% (n = 154) and 39% (n = 96) of the patients were on β-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers and spironolactone, respectively. Only 33% (n = 81) of the patients were on the triple guideline-based cardiovascular medication classes concurrently. Patients with reduced ejection fraction were more likely to be prescribed the triple guideline-based cardiovascular medication classes concurrently than those that had heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (37% vs 22%; p = 0.027). A total of 100% (96/96), 56% (121/216) and 42% (64/153) of the patients were prescribed ≥ 50% of target dose for spironolactone, β-blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, respectively. Conclusions The use of guideline-based cardiovascular medications in heart failure patients with reduced and mid-range ejection fraction is low in Oman. They were also largely not optimally dosed at target levels.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCanadaGuideline AdherenceHumansInfant, NewbornMaleOmanRegistriesStroke VolumeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsGuideline adherenceHeart failureMaximal tolerated dosesOmanTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.