Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140272›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2021

Measures of Organizational Culture and Climate in Primary Care: a Systematic Review.

Kimberly S Hsiung, Jason B Colditz, Elizabeth A McGuier, Galen E Switzer, Helena M VonVille, Barbara L Folb, David J Kolko

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Who's Not Talking? Nonresponse Bias in Healthcare Employee Well-Being Surveys.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimberly S HsiungUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, , Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ksl49@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5568-2019
Jason B ColditzUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, , Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Elizabeth A McGuierUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, , Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Galen E SwitzerDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, , Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Helena M VonVilleHealth Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, , Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Barbara L FolbHealth Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, , Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David J KolkoUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, , Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care is increasingly contributing to improving the quality of patient care. This has imposed significant demands on clinicians with rising needs and limited resources. Organizational culture and climate have been found to be crucial in improving workforce well-being and hence quality of care. The objectives of this study are to identify organizational culture and climate measures used in primary care from 2008 to 2019 and evaluate their psychometric properties.

methodsData sources include PubMed, PsycINFO, HAPI, CINAHL, and Mental Measurements Yearbook. Bibliographies of relevant articles were reviewed and a cited reference search in Scopus was performed. Eligibility criteria include primary health care professionals, primary care settings, and use of measures representing the general concept of organizational culture and climate. Consensus-Based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines were followed to evaluate individual studies for methodological quality, rate results of measurement properties, qualitatively pool studies by measure, and grade evidence.

resultsOf 1745 initial studies, 42 studies met key study inclusion criteria, with 27 measures available for review (16 for organizational culture, 11 for organizational climate). There was considerable variability in measures, both conceptually and in psychometric quality. Many reported limited or no psychometric information. DISCUSSION: Notable measures selected for frequent use and strength and applicability of measurement properties include the Culture Questionnaire adapted for health care settings, Practice Culture Assessment, and Medical Group Practice Culture Assessment for organizational culture. Notable climate measures include the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire, Practice Climate Survey, and Task and Relational Climate Scale. This synthesis and appraisal of organizational culture and climate measures can help investigators make informed decisions in choosing a measure or deciding to develop a new one. In terms of limitations, ratings should be considered conservative due to adaptations of the COSMIN protocol for clinician populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD 42019133117.

Indexed as

Organizational CulturePrimary Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOSMINorganizational climateorganizational cultureprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33140272
PMCPMC7878641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.