Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140267›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2021

Effect of different treatments on recurrent aphthous stomatitis: laser versus medication.

Xiao Huo, Ning Han, Li Liu

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Treatment of recurrent aphtous stomatitis: A systematic review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao HuoDepartment of Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University & Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, No. 383, Zhongshan East Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang City, 050017, Hebei Province, China.
Ning HanDepartment of Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University & Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, No. 383, Zhongshan East Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang City, 050017, Hebei Province, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University & Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, No. 383, Zhongshan East Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang City, 050017, Hebei Province, China. liuli2888@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-0140
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

Key research and development projects in Hebei province 18277776DProject supported by government for cultivating excellent talents in clinical medicine 2019061441-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common disease with ulcers in oral cavity which may trigger chewing, speaking, and swallowing difficulties to patients. Treatment of RAS is primarily aimed at pain relief and the promotion of wound healing. However, few agents have been found to have definite effect in the management of RAS and most of the medicinal products may cause adverse reactions or other disadvantages, which makes their clinical usage questionable. The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was to assess the clinical effect of diode laser and traditional medication treatment on RAS. In this study, 56 patients were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 28). Laser group was treated using diode laser (810 nm, 1.0 W, CW, irradiation time 20 s for 3 applications) once daily for continuous 3 days. Medication group was treated with triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% three times a day until the lesion was healed. Spontaneous and functional pain level on the third day of treatment was significantly less in the laser group. Significant difference was observed with respect to healing time; however, the order of difference is small albeit of statistical significance. Diode laser with the chosen parameters had better effects on pain relief and no distinct advantage on wound healing comparing with medication. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000030298; date of registration: 26 February 2020 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyAdultHumansMalePain ManagementRecurrenceStomatitis, AphthousTreatment OutcomeWound HealingLow level laser therapyPainPhotobiomodulationRecurrent aphthous stomatitisWound healing

Identifiers

PMID33140267
OpenAlexW3095394857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.