Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140245›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021

Communication Patterns Among Male Couples with Open and Monogamous Agreements.

Staci Gusakova, Kristi Chin, Esra Ascigil, Terri D Conley, Deepalika Chakravarty, Torsten B Neilands, Colleen C Hoff, Lynae A Darbes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Staci GusakovaDepartments of Psychology and Women's and Gender Studies, University of Michigan, 530 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA. gusakova@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9769-2394
Kristi ChinDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Esra AscigilDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Terri D ConleyDepartments of Psychology and Women's and Gender Studies, University of Michigan, 530 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
Deepalika ChakravartyDepartment of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Torsten B NeilandsDepartment of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Colleen C HoffCenter for Research and Education on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lynae A DarbesDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sheri Ann Lippman · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
Continuation of Longitudinal Gay Couples StudyR01MH075598 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOFF, COLLEEN · 2006 to 2014
$5.2M
NIMH NIH HHS MH 075598NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male couples in open relationships tend to have as equally fulfilling relationships as monogamous male couples; however, less is known about communication differences between monogamous and open couples. Because couples with open agreements permit sex with outside partners, they must navigate different relationship issues than monogamous couples, and this can translate to differences in communication. We therefore examined differences between cisgender men in monogamous versus open relationships regarding communication about sexual agreements, safety agreements, breaking of sexual and safety agreements, the disclosure of broken sexual and safety agreements, and general relationship communication. Using a sample of 395 couples, we found that while certain aspects of communication are different for monogamous couples compared to open couples, similarities also exist. Specifically, we identified no differences in how explicitly couples discussed their sexual and safety agreements, attitudes toward communication about safety agreements, and mutual avoidance and withholding communication. However, monogamous couples had more positive attitudes toward communication about sexual agreements. The results were mixed on the perceived impact that broken safety agreements had on communication with the primary partner. Our results are interpreted with attention to relationship well-being and implications for safer sex practices.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual PartnersCommunicationHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMarriageSexual BehaviorConsensual non-monogamyMale couplesSexual agreementsSexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID33140245
PMCPMC8631168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.