Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140208›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2021

AMOEBA binding free energies for the SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest challenge.

Yuanjun Shi, Marie L Laury, Zhi Wang, Jay W Ponder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Atomic Polarizabilities for Interactive Dipole Induction Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. SAMPL7 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuanjun ShiDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Marie L LauryDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Zhi WangDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Jay W PonderDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA. ponder@dasher.wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5450-9230

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION NUCLEIC ACID FORCE FIELDR01GM106137 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JAY PONDER, Pengyu Ren · 2013 to 2026
$3.5M
Specificity and Selectivity in Protein-Ion BindingR01GM114237 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PONDER, JAY, REN, PENGYU · 2015 to 2023
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106137NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of the SAMPL7 host-guest binding challenge, the AMOEBA force field was applied to calculate the absolute binding free energy for 16 charged organic ammonium guests to the TrimerTrip host, a recently reported acyclic cucurbituril-derived clip host structure with triptycene moieties at its termini. Here we report binding free energy calculations for this system using the AMOEBA polarizable atomic multipole force field and double annihilation free energy methodology. Conformational analysis of the host suggests three families of conformations that do not interconvert in solution on a time scale available to nanosecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Two of these host conformers, referred to as the "indent" and "overlap" structures, are capable of binding guest molecules. As a result, the free energies of all 16 guests binding to both conformations were computed separately, and combined to produce values for comparison with experiment. Initial ranked results submitted as part of the SAMPL7 exercise had a mean unsigned error (MUE) from experimental binding data of 2.14 kcal/mol. Subsequently, a rigorous umbrella sampling reference calculation was used to better determine the free energy difference between unligated "indent" and "overlap" host conformations. Revised binding values for the 16 guests pegged to this umbrella sampling reference reduced the MUE to 1.41 kcal/mol, with a correlation coefficient (Pearson R) between calculated and experimental binding values of 0.832 and a rank correlation (Kendall τ) of 0.65. Overall, the AMOEBA results demonstrate no significant systematic error, suggesting the force field provides an accurate energetic description of the TrimerTrip host, and an appropriate balance of solvation and desolvation effects associated with guest binding.

Indexed as

Bridged-Ring CompoundsCucurbit(n)urilsEntropyHumansLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular StructureProtein BindingProteinsThermodynamicsBridged-Ring CompoundsCucurbit(n)urilsLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsProteinsAbsolute binding free energyAMOEBAForce fieldSAMPL7

Identifiers

PMID33140208
PMCPMC7867568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.