Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33140165›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2020

Cryptosporidium infections in sheep farms from Italy.

G Dessì, C Tamponi, A Varcasia, G Sanna, A P Pipia, S Carta, F Salis, P Díaz, A Scala

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The global prevalence ofParasitology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Detection and Distribution ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G DessìLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
C TamponiLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
A VarcasiaLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy. varcasia@uniss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6306-9978
G SannaLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
A P PipiaLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
S CartaLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
F SalisInvestigation in Animal Health: Galicia (INVESAGA Group), School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.
P DíazLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
A ScalaLaboratory of Parasitology, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Parassitologia Veterinaria, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
University of Sassari · ITUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptosporidiosis is recognized as being a significant cause of gastrointestinal illness due to its wide range of vertebrate hosts, including humans. Infection with Cryptosporidium spp. is especially common in young domestic ruminants (calves, lambs and goat kids) and has been associated with economic losses worldwide. In contrast to cattle, to date, detailed studies on Cryptosporidium infections in sheep from Europe are still limited; thus, their importance as reservoirs of Cryptosporidium species with implications on animal and public health still needs to be clarified. This study evaluates the prevalence and zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium spp. in sheep farms in Italy. A total of 915 individual faecal samples divided into three different animal categories were collected from 61 sheep farms. Each sample was examined by microscopy of faecal smears stained by modified Ziehl-Neelsen and by biomolecular techniques. Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected in 10.1% of the animals examined and in 34.4% of the farms. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. was significantly higher (χ

Indexed as

AnimalsCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumFarmsFecesGenotypeItalyPrevalenceSheepSheep DiseasesCryptosporidiumItalyLambsSheepZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID33140165
PMCPMC7704443
OpenAlexW3096614831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.