Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33139941›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2020

Brain organoids for the study of human neurobiology at the interface of in vitro and in vivo.

Ilaria Chiaradia, Madeline A Lancaster

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 335 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Media portrayal of ethical and social issues in brain organoid research.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Using Brain Organoids to Explore Human Neurobiology.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilaria ChiaradiaMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9529-4464
Madeline A LancasterMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. madeline.lancaster@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-8853
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain development is an extraordinarily complex process achieved through the spatially and temporally regulated release of key patterning factors. In vitro neurodevelopmental models seek to mimic these processes to recapitulate the steps of tissue fate acquisition and morphogenesis. Classic two-dimensional neural cultures present higher homogeneity but lower complexity compared to the brain. Brain organoids instead have more advanced cell composition, maturation and tissue architecture. They can thus be considered at the interface of in vitro and in vivo neurobiology, and further improvements in organoid techniques are continuing to narrow the gap with in vivo brain development. Here we describe these efforts to recapitulate brain development in neural organoids and focus on their applicability for disease modeling, evolutionary studies and neural network research.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansIn Vitro TechniquesNeurobiologyOrganoids

Identifiers

PMID33139941
OpenAlexW3097707819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.