Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33139867›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2021

Efficacy of prophylactic letermovir for cytomegalovirus reactivation in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a multicenter real-world data.

Yasuo Mori, Fumiaki Jinnouchi, Katsuto Takenaka, Takatoshi Aoki, Takuro Kuriyama, Masanori Kadowaki, Jun Odawara, Toshiyuki Ueno, Kentaro Kohno, Takuya Harada and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mortality in recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in the era of cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis: a single-centre retrospective experience.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuo MoriDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Fumiaki JinnouchiDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Katsuto TakenakaDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takatoshi AokiDepartment of Hematology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takuro KuriyamaDepartment of Hematology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masanori KadowakiDepartment of Hematology and Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Jun OdawaraDepartment of Hematology, Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Toshiyuki UenoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kentaro KohnoJapan Community Health Care Organization (JCHO) Kyushu Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takuya HaradaDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Goichi YoshimotoDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ken TakaseDepartment of Hematology and Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hideho HenzanDepartment of Hematology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koji KatoDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshikiyo ItoDepartment of Hematology, Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Tomohiko KamimuraDepartment of Hematology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuju OhnoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryosuke OgawaJapan Community Health Care Organization (JCHO) Kyushu Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tetsuya EtoDepartment of Hematology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koji NagafujiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koichi AkashiDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toshihiro MiyamotoDepartment of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan. toshmiya@intmed1.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6533-1594
Kyushu University · JPHamanomachi Hospital · JPHarasanshin Hospital · JPImamura Hospital · JPKitakyushu Municipal Medical Center · JPKyushu Hospital · JPNational Kyushu Medical Center · JPKurume University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) agent, letermovir (LMV), could reportedly improve the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients because of its high potential to prevent CMV reactivation. Therefore, 685 Japanese allo-HCT recipients, of whom ~80% had a high risk of CMV reactivation, were retrospectively analyzed to assess the impacts of prophylactic LMV on the incidence of clinically significant CMV (csCMV) infection as well as their transplant outcome. By comparing 114 patients who received LMV prophylaxis for a median 92 days to 571 patients without prophylaxis, we observed that prophylactic LMV could significantly (1) reduce the 180-day cumulative incidence of csCMV infection (44.7 vs. 72.4%, p < 0.001), (2) delay the median time until initiation of CMV antigenemia-guided preemptive therapy (90 vs. 36 days, p < 0.001), (3) shorten the duration of anti-CMV preemptive treatment (21 vs. 25 days, p = 0.006), and (4) improve the overall survival rate at 180 days after transplant (80.4 vs. 73.0%, p = 0.033) with a trend of lower non-relapse mortality (8.9 vs. 14.9%, p = 0.052). Our findings demonstrate that prophylactic LMV treatment is highly effective in preventing the development of csCMV infection and ultimately reduces transplant-related mortality.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAcetatesAntiviral AgentsCytomegalovirusHumansQuinazolinesRetrospective StudiesAcetatesAntiviral AgentsletermovirQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID33139867
OpenAlexW3097497565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.