ArticleScientific reports2020
Real-time detection of somatic hybrid cells during electrofusion of carrot protoplasts with stably labelled mitochondria.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carrot extracellular nanovesicles as carotenoid carriers in an in vitro macular degeneration model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in and Perspectives on Transgenic Technology and CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing in Broccoli.Genes · 2024Review
- A highly efficient protocol for isolation of protoplast from China, Assam and Cambod types of tea plants [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze].Plant methods · 2023Article
- Early selection of carrot somatic hybrids: a promising tool for species with high regenerative ability.Plant methods · 2023Article
- Protoplast Technology and Somatic Hybridisation in the Family Apiaceae.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Isolation, purification and PEG-mediated transient expression of mesophyll protoplasts in Camellia oleifera.Plant methods · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Somatic hybridisation in the carrot, as in other plant species, enables the development of novel plants with unique characteristics. This process can be induced by the application of electric current to isolated protoplasts, but such electrofusion requires an effective hybrid cell identification method. This paper describes the non-toxic fluorescent protein (FP) tagging of protoplasts which allows discrimination of fusion components and identification of hybrids in real-time during electrofusion. One of four FPs: cyan (eCFP), green (sGFP), yellow (eYFP) or the mCherry variant of red FP (RFP), with a fused mitochondrial targeting sequence, was introduced to carrot cell lines of three varieties using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. After selection, a set of carrot callus lines with either GFP, YFP or RFP-labelled mitochondria that showed stable fluorescence served as protoplast sources. Various combinations of direct current (DC) parameters on protoplast integrity and their ability to form hybrid cells were assessed during electrofusion. The protoplast response and hybrid cell formation depended on DC voltage and pulse time, and varied among protoplast sources. Heterofusants (GFP + RFP or YFP + RFP) were identified by detection of a dual-colour fluorescence. This approach enabled, for the first time, a comprehensive assessment of the carrot protoplast response to the applied electric field conditions as well as identification of the DC parameters suitable for hybrid formation, and an estimation of the electrofusion success rate by performing real-time observations of protoplast fluorescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.