Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33139846›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2021

Early and sustained improvements in motor function in rats after infusion of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells following spinal cord injury.

F M Moinuddin, Yagiz U Yolcu, Waseem Wahood, Ahad M Siddiqui, Bingkun K Chen, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Anshit Goyal, Jarred J Nesbitt, Anthony J Windebank, Jiunn-Chern Yeh and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Open-Spaced Ridged Hydrogel Scaffolds Containing TiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F M MoinuddinMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yagiz U YolcuMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Waseem WahoodMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ahad M SiddiquiDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-1728
Bingkun K ChenDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mohammed Ali AlviMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Anshit GoyalMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jarred J NesbittDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Anthony J WindebankDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jiunn-Chern YehAnimal Cell Therapies, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Kathy PetrucciAnimal Cell Therapies, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Mohamad BydonMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. bydon.mohamad@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0543-396X
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USVital Therapies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designAnimal study.

objectivesUmbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) have recently been shown to hold great therapeutic potential for spinal cord injury (SCI). However, majority of the studies have been done using human cells transplanted into the rat with immunosuppression; this may not represent the outcomes that occur in humans. Herein, we present the therapeutic effect of using rat UC-MSCs (rUC-MSC) without immunosuppression in a rat model of SCI.

settingMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

methodsTwelve female rats were randomly divided into two groups, control, and rUC-MSC group, and then subjected to a T9 moderate contusion SCI. Next, 2 × 10

resultsAnimals treated with rUC-MSCs were found to have early and sustained motor improvement (BBB score of 14.6 ± 1.9 compared to 10.1 ± 1.7 in the control group) at 14 weeks post injury (mean difference: 4.55, 95% CI: 2.04 to 7.06; p value < 0.001). Total cavity volume in the injury epicenter was significantly reduced in the rUC-MSC group; control: 33.0% ± 2.1, rUC-MSC: 25.3% ± 3.8 (mean difference: -7.7% (95% CI: -12.3 to -2.98); p value < 0.05). In addition, spinal cords from rats treated with rUC-MSCs were found to have a significantly greater number of myelinated axons, decreased astrogliosis, and reduced glial scar formation compared to control rats.

conclusionsOur study indicates that intravenous injection of allogenic UC-MSCs without immunosuppression exert beneficial effects in subacute SCI and thus could be a useful therapy to improve the functional capacity among patients with SCI.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsFemaleHumansRatsRecovery of FunctionSpinal CordUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID33139846
OpenAlexW3096051222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.