Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33139621›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2020

Molecular Profiling of Malignant Pleural Effusions with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Evidence that Supports Its Role in Cancer Management.

Georgia Ι Grigoriadou, Stepan M Esagian, Han Suk Ryu, Ilias P Nikas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liquid biopsy in modern medicine: advancing diagnostics from molecular insights to clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The application of high-throughput proteomics in cytopathology.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Georgia Ι Grigoriadou1st Department of Medical Oncology, Theageneio Anticancer Hospital, 54007 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3225-805X
Stepan M EsagianDepartment of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7602-862X
Han Suk RyuDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Ilias P NikasSchool of Medicine, European University of Cyprus, 2404 Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-8625-2556
Democritus University of Thrace · GREuropean University Cyprus · CYSeoul National University Hospital · KRTheageneio General Hospital · GR

Funding

School of Medicine, European University Cyprus EUC will pay for the article processing fees in case the article is accepted
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) often develop in advanced cancer patients and confer significant morbidity and mortality. In this review, we evaluated whether molecular profiling of MPEs with next generation sequencing (NGS) could have a role in cancer management, focusing on lung cancer. We reviewed and compared the diagnostic performance of pleural fluid liquid biopsy with other types of samples. When applied in MPEs, NGS may have comparable performance with corresponding tissue biopsies, yield higher DNA amount, and detect more genetic aberrations than blood-derived liquid biopsies. NGS in MPEs may also be preferable to plasma liquid biopsy in advanced cancer patients with a MPE and a paucicellular or it could be difficult to obtain tissue/fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Of interest, post-centrifuge supernatant NGS may exhibit superior results compared to cell pellet, cell block or other materials. NGS in MPEs can also guide clinicians in tailoring established therapies and identifying therapy resistance. Evidence is still premature regarding the role of NGS in MPEs from patients with cancers other than lung. We concluded that MPE processing could provide useful prognostic and theranostic information, besides its diagnostic role.

Indexed as

biomarkerscytologyEGFRliquid biopsynon-small cell lung carcinomaNSCLCpleural fluidprecision oncologysupernatanttherapy resistance

Identifiers

PMID33139621
PMCPMC7712846
OpenAlexW3096255336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.