Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138954›Full record

ReviewSpatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology2020

The unknown denominator problem in population studies of disease frequency.

Christopher N Morrison, Andrew G Rundle, Charles C Branas, Stanford Chihuri, Christina Mehranbod, Guohua Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher N MorrisonDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia. Electronic address: cm3820@cumc.columbia.edu.
Andrew G RundleDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Charles C BranasDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Stanford ChihuriDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Christina MehranbodDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Guohua LiDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Funding

CE19-001, The Columbia Center for Injury Science and Prevention (CCISP)R49CE003094 · CE · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRANAS, CHARLES C. · 2018 to 2023
$4.3M
Influences Of In-Person Social Networks, Digital Social Networks And Neighborhoods On Adolescent Alcohol ConsumptionK01AA026327 · NIAAA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MORRISON, CHRISTOPHER NEIL · 2018 to 2022
$903k
ACL HHS R49CE003094NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE003094NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA026327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problems related to unknown or imprecisely measured populations at risk are common in epidemiologic studies of disease frequency. The size of the population at risk is typically conceptualized as a denominator to be used in combination with a count of disease cases (a numerator) to calculate incidence or prevalence. However, the size of the population at risk can take other epidemiologic properties in relation to an exposure of interest and the count outcome, including confounding, modification, and mediation. Using spatial ecological studies of injury incidence as an example, we identify and evaluate five approaches that researchers have used to address "unknown denominator problems": ignoring, controlling for a proxy, approximating, controlling by study design, and measuring the population at risk. We present a case example and recommendations for selecting a solution given the data and the hypothesized relationship between an exposure of interest, a count outcome, and the population at risk.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAccidents, TrafficConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicHumansIncidenceNew York CityResearch DesignSpatio-Temporal AnalysisWounds and InjuriesAcuteInjuryMethodologySpace-timeSpatial

Identifiers

PMID33138954
PMCPMC7609977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.