Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138865›Full record

GuidelineScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during spaceflight - a guideline for CPR in microgravity from the German Society of Aerospace Medicine (DGLRM) and the European Society of Aerospace Medicine Space Medicine Group (ESAM-SMG).

Jochen Hinkelbein, Steffen Kerkhoff, Christoph Adler, Anton Ahlbäck, Stefan Braunecker, Daniel Burgard, Fabrizio Cirillo, Edoardo De Robertis, Eckard Glaser, Theresa K Haidl and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Development of a Digital Platform: A Perspective to Advance Space Telepharmacy.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Facing Trauma and Surgical Emergency in Space: Hemorrhagic Shock.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 18 institutions in 6 countries.

Jochen HinkelbeinGerman Society of Aviation and Space Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany. jochen.hinkelbein@gmail.com.
Steffen KerkhoffGerman Society of Aviation and Space Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany.
Christoph AdlerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Heart Centre of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anton AhlbäckSpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Stefan BrauneckerSpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Daniel BurgardDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Heart Center Duisburg, Evangelisches Klinikum Niederrhein, Duisburg, Germany.
Fabrizio CirilloDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy.
Edoardo De RobertisDivision of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Eckard GlaserGerman Society of Aviation and Space Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany.
Theresa K HaidlDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Pete HodkinsonSpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Ivan Zefiro IovinoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Naples, Italy.
Stefanie JansenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Kolaparambil Varghese Lydia JohnsonSpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Saskia JüngerCologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matthieu KomorowskiSpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Marion LearySchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christina MackaillSpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Alexander NagrebetskyDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Christopher NeuhausGerman Society of Aviation and Space Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany.
Lucas RehnbergUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Anaesthetic Department, Southampton, UK.
Giovanni Marco RomanoAnesthesia and Postoperative Intensive Care Unit, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
Thais RussomanoCentre of Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
Jan SchmitzGerman Society of Aviation and Space Medicine (DGLRM), Munich, Germany.
Oliver SpeltenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Schön Klinik Düsseldorf, Am Heerdter Krankenhaus 2, 40549, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Clément StarckSpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Seamus ThierrySpace Medicine Group, European Society of Aerospace Medicine (ESAM), Cologne, Germany.
Rochelle VelhoAcademic Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care, Pain and Resuscitation, University Hospitals Birmingham, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Tobias WarneckeUniversity Department for Anesthesia, Intensive and Emergency Medicine and Pain Management, Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
European Astronaut Centre · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEOspedale Santa Maria · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FREvangelisches Klinikum NiederrheiHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBInternational Maritime Organization · GBKing's College London · GBKlinikum Oldenburg · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · USÖrebro University Hospital · SEOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the "Artemis"-mission mankind will return to the Moon by 2024. Prolonged periods in space will not only present physical and psychological challenges to the astronauts, but also pose risks concerning the medical treatment capabilities of the crew. So far, no guideline exists for the treatment of severe medical emergencies in microgravity. We, as a international group of researchers related to the field of aerospace medicine and critical care, took on the challenge and developed a an evidence-based guideline for the arguably most severe medical emergency - cardiac arrest.

methodsAfter the creation of said international group, PICO questions regarding the topic cardiopulmonary resuscitation in microgravity were developed to guide the systematic literature research. Afterwards a precise search strategy was compiled which was then applied to "MEDLINE". Four thousand one hundred sixty-five findings were retrieved and consecutively screened by at least 2 reviewers. This led to 88 original publications that were acquired in full-text version and then critically appraised using the GRADE methodology. Those studies formed to basis for the guideline recommendations that were designed by at least 2 experts on the given field. Afterwards those recommendations were subject to a consensus finding process according to the DELPHI-methodology.

resultsWe recommend a differentiated approach to CPR in microgravity with a division into basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) similar to the Earth-based guidelines. In immediate BLS, the chest compression method of choice is the Evetts-Russomano method (ER), whereas in an ALS scenario, with the patient being restrained on the Crew Medical Restraint System, the handstand method (HS) should be applied. Airway management should only be performed if at least two rescuers are present and the patient has been restrained. A supraglottic airway device should be used for airway management where crew members untrained in tracheal intubation (TI) are involved. DISCUSSION: CPR in microgravity is feasible and should be applied according to the Earth-based guidelines of the AHA/ERC in relation to fundamental statements, like urgent recognition and action, focus on high-quality chest compressions, compression depth and compression-ventilation ratio. However, the special circumstances presented by microgravity and spaceflight must be considered concerning central points such as rescuer position and methods for the performance of chest compressions, airway management and defibrillation.

Indexed as

ConsensusSocieties, MedicalSpace FlightAerospace MedicineCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCritical CareEmergenciesEuropeHeart ArrestHumans

Identifiers

PMID33138865
PMCPMC7607644
OpenAlexW3095497449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.