ReviewBiology direct2020
Mini-review: advances in 3D bioprinting of vascularized constructs.
Review in Biology direct, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- From Medical Imaging to Bioprinted Tissues: The Importance of Workflow Optimisation for Improved Cell Function.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Leveraging printability and biocompatibility in materials for printing implantable vessel scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Advancing cardiac regeneration through 3D bioprinting: methods, applications, and future directions.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- The crisscross between p53 and metabolism in cancer.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023Review
- Myocardial infarction from a tissue engineering and regenerative medicine point of view: A comprehensive review on models and treatments.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Article
- Long-Fiber Embedded Hydrogel 3D Printing for Structural Reinforcement.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Article
- Modelling Human Physiology on-Chip: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Understanding p53 tumour suppressor network.Biology direct · 2021Article
- Current Insights Into 3D Bioprinting: An Advanced Approach for Eye Tissue Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Bio-assembling and Bioprinting for Engineering Microvessels from the Bottom Up.International journal of bioprinting · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D in vitro constructs have gained more and more relevance in tissue engineering and in cancer-modeling. In recent years, with the development of thicker and more physiologically relevant tissue patches, the integration of a vascular network has become pivotal, both for sustaining the construct in vitro and to help the integration with the host tissue once implanted. Since 3D bioprinting is rising to be one of the most versatile methods to create vascularized constructs, we here briefly review the most promising advances in bioprinting techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.