Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138804›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2020

OPTImising the implementation of pulMonary rehAbiLitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (the OPTIMAL study): mixed methods study protocol.

Sarah Hug, Vinicius Cavalheri, Daniel F Gucciardi, Richard Norman, Kylie Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah HugSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Vinicius CavalheriSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Daniel F GucciardiSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Richard NormanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Kylie HillSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. k.hill@curtin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6082-6352
Curtin University · AU

Funding

Department of Health, Government of Western Australia RES-HEA-SOP-CL-61482-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common respiratory condition characterised by dyspnoea during daily life. As the disease progresses, people with COPD can experience poor quality of life, reduced exercise capacity, worsening of symptoms and increased hospital admissions. Pulmonary rehabilitation, which includes exercise training, optimises both psychological and physical function, reduces symptoms and mitigates healthcare utilisation in people with COPD. There is, however, a gap in implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation programs, with global access limited to a small fraction of people with COPD. The overall aim of this study is to gather evidence that will optimise the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD living in Perth, Western Australia.

methodsThis is a mixed methods study protocol informed by a critical realist perspective. The study will comprise four phases. In Phase 1, we will quantify target behaviours of healthcare professionals and people with COPD which are related to the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation at three tertiary hospitals. In Phase 2, we will conduct semi-structured interviews to explore the determinants of these target behaviours from the perspectives of healthcare professionals, people with COPD and their primary support person. In Phase 3, knowledge gained in Phases 1 and 2 will be used by healthcare professionals and people with COPD to co-create, field test and apply strategies that optimise these target behaviours. In Phase 4, we will re-quantify these target behaviours to determine the influence of co-created strategies. The cost effectiveness of implementing the co-created strategies will be explored by an economic analysis. DISCUSSION: Understanding current clinical practice and the determinants of target behaviours pertaining to the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation is crucial when developing strategies that successfully bridge the pulmonary rehabilitation implementation gap. If co-created strategies are effective, more people with COPD living in Perth, Western Australia will have access to pulmonary rehabilitation enabling them to derive the health benefits associated with this intervention.

Indexed as

Research DesignAttitude of Health PersonnelCost-Benefit AnalysisDyspneaExercise TherapyExercise ToleranceHealth StatusHospitalizationHumansInterviews as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeWestern AustraliaAdherenceAttendanceChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCo-creationParticipatory researchPulmonary rehabilitationReferralUptake

Identifiers

PMID33138804
PMCPMC7607703
OpenAlexW3094701262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.