Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138716›Full record

ArticleScience progress

The usability of ventilator maintenance user interface: A comparative evaluation of user task performance, workload, and user experience.

Mingyin Jiang, Dongjie Sun, Qiang Li, Daoxiong Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingyin JiangDepartment of Medical Equipment, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dongjie SunDepartment of Medical Equipment, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qiang LiDepartment of Medical Equipment, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Daoxiong WangDepartment of Medical Equipment, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor usability designed of ventilator user interface can easily lead to human error. In this study, we evaluated the usability design of ventilator maintenance user interface and identified problems related to the usability of user interface that could easily cause human error. Sixteen respiratory therapists participated in this usability study. The usability of the ventilator maintenance user interface was evaluated by participants' task performance (task completion time, task error rate), physiological workload (eye-fixation duration) and perceived workload (NASA-TLX), and user experience (questionnaire). For task performance, task completion time and task error rate showed significant differences. For task completion time, significant difference was found when conducting ventilator self-test (

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisWorkloadEquipment DesignHumansRespiration, ArtificialVentilators, MechanicalCritical careequipment designeye movement measurementsuser computer interfaceventilator

Identifiers

PMID33138716
PMCPMC10450887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.