Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138637›Full record

SynthesisBiological research for nursing2021

Allostatic Load in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Mini Meta-Analysis.

Asha Mathew, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Hongjin Li, Min Kyeong Jang, Chang Gi Park, Ulf G Bronas

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological research for nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Allostatic Load, Multimorbidity, and Overall and Cancer-Specific Survival among Older Adults in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Census Tract-Level Persistent Poverty and Liver Cancer Survival: A Population-Based Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  15. L-SOLCO Pilot Study: Examining Allostatic Load and Cancer Treatment Disparities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asha Mathew14681College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2159-2215
Ardith Z Doorenbos14681College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hongjin Li14681College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-1192
Min Kyeong Jang14681College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Chang Gi Park14681College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ulf G Bronas14681College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7896-0832

Funding

Applying Technology to Problems in Pain and Symptom ManagementK24NR015340 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOORENBOS, ARDITH Z · 2014 to 2018
$842k
NINR NIH HHS K24 NR015340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with cancer experience stress throughout the cancer trajectory. Allostatic load (AL), a cumulative multi-system measure, may have a greater value in stress assessment and the associated biological burden than individual biomarkers. A better understanding of the use of AL and its operationalization in cancer could aid in early detection and prevention or alleviation of AL in this population. PURPOSE: To consolidate findings on the operationalization, antecedents, and outcomes of AL in cancer.

methodsSeven databases (CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched for articles published through April 2020. The NIH tools were used to assess study quality.

resultsTwelve studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Although variability existed in the estimation of AL, biomarkers of cardiovascular, metabolic, and immune systems were mostly used. Associations of AL with cancer-specific variables were examined mostly utilizing population-databases. Significant associations of AL with variables such as cancer-related stress, positive cancer history, post traumatic growth, resilience, tumor pathology, and cancer-specific mortality were found. Mini meta-analysis found that a one-unit increase in AL was associated with a 9% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality.

conclusionThis review reveals heterogeneity in operationalization of AL in cancer research and lack of clarity regarding causal direction between AL and cancer. Nevertheless, AL holds a significant promise in cancer research and practice. AL could be included as a screening tool for high-risk individuals or a health outcome in cancer. Optimal standardized approaches to measure AL would improve its clinical utility.

Indexed as

AllostasisNeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersallostasisallostatic loadcancerneoplasmstressstress biomarkersstress response

Identifiers

PMID33138637
PMCPMC8755951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.