ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2020
Effects of auditory training on low-pass filtered speech perception and listening-related cognitive load.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Worsened multitasking performance with simulated hearing protection correlates with individuals' choice not to "wear" it.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Impacts of listening practice on work performance while wearing hearing protection.Discover public health · 2026Article
- Not fully remembered, but not forgotten: interfering sounds worsen but do not eliminate the representation of pitch in working memory.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Learning to detect auditory signals in noise: Active top-down selection and stable change in signal representations.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2023Article
- Effortful listening produces both enhancement and suppression of alpha in the EEG.Auditory perception & cognition · 2023Article
- EEG power spectral dynamics associated with listening in adverse conditions.Psychophysiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies supporting learning-induced reductions in listening-related cognitive load have lacked procedural learning controls, making it difficult to determine the extent to which effects arise from perceptual or procedural learning. Here, listeners were trained in the coordinate response measure (CRM) task under unfiltered (UT) or degraded low-pass filtered (FT) conditions. Improvements in low-pass filtered CRM performance were larger for FT. Both conditions showed training-related reductions in cognitive load as indexed by a secondary working memory task. However, only the FT condition showed a correlation between CRM improvement and secondary task performance, suggesting that effects can be driven by perceptual and procedural learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.