ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2020
Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Web-based psychoacoustics: Hearing screening, infrastructure, and validation.Behavior research methods · 2024Pooled it
- Multi-dimensional evaluation of user-operated audible contrast sensitivity tests towards efficient hearing healthcare services.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Remote Sensory-Cognitive Assessment in Children with Autism: Evaluating Feasibility and Performance Outcomes.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Portable automated rapid testing for auditory assessment: repeated at-home testing in older adults.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Age-Related Differences in Comprehending Speech in Competition.American journal of audiology · 2025Article
- Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Individual differences elucidate the perceptual benefits associated with robust temporal fine-structure processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- PLFest: A New Platform for Accessible, Reproducible, and Open Perceptual Learning Research.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2024Article
- Individual Differences Elucidate the Perceptual Benefits Associated with Robust Temporal Fine-Structure Processing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- A Characterization of Central Auditory Processing in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Validation of the adaptive scan method in the quest for time-efficient methods of testing auditory processes.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Effects of Gamification on Assessment of Spatial Release From Masking.American journal of audiology · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a Spanish-language spatial release from masking task in a Mexican population.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Remote auditory assessment using Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) and participant-owned devices.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Relating Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Abilities to Speech Understanding in Competition.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Remote Categorical Loudness Scaling.American journal of audiology · 2022Article
- Training with an auditory perceptual learning game transfers to speech in competition.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2022Article
- Clinical Importance of Binaural Information: Extending Auditory Assessment in Clinical Populations Using a Portable Testing Platform.American journal of audiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to determine the degree to which Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART), a freely available program running on a tablet computer, is capable of reproducing standard laboratory results. Undergraduate students were assigned to one of three within-subject conditions that examined repeatability of performance on a battery of psychoacoustical tests of temporal fine structure processing, spectro-temporal amplitude modulation, and targets in competition. The repeatability condition examined test/retest with the same system, the headphones condition examined the effects of varying headphones (passive and active noise-attenuating), and the noise condition examined repeatability in the presence of recorded cafeteria noise. In general, performance on the test battery showed high repeatability, even across manipulated conditions, and was similar to that reported in the literature. These data serve as validation that suprathreshold psychoacoustical tests can be made accessible to run on consumer-grade hardware and perform in less controlled settings. This dataset also provides a distribution of thresholds that can be used as a normative baseline against which auditory dysfunction can be identified in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.