Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138167›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Development of the Digital Assessment of Precise Physical Activity (DAPPA) Tool for Older Adults.

Rosie Essery, James Denison-Day, Elisabeth Grey, Emma Priestley, Katherine Bradbury, Nanette Mutrie, Max J Western

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosie EsseryCentre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
James Denison-DayCentre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Elisabeth GreyCentre for Motivation and Health Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Emma PriestleyCentre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Katherine BradburyCentre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Nanette MutriePhysical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, UK.
Max J WesternCentre for Motivation and Health Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is central to maintaining health and wellbeing as we age. Valid, reliable measurement tools are vital for understanding, and evaluating PA. There are limited options for comprehensively, accurately and affordably measuring older adults' PA at scale at present. We aimed to develop a digital PA measurement tool specifically for adults aged 65+ using a person-based approach. We collated evidence from target users, field experts and the relevant literature to learn how older adults comprehend PA and would accept a digital tool. Findings suggest that older adults' PA is often integrated into their daily life activities and that commonly applied terminology (e.g., moderate and vigorous) can be difficult to interpret. We also found that there is increasing familiarity with digital platforms amongst older adults, and that technological simplicity is valued. These findings informed the development of a digital tool that asks users to report their activities across key PA domains and dimensions from the previous 7-days. Users found the tool easy to navigate and comprehensive in terms of activity reporting. However, real-world usability testing revealed that users struggled with seven-day recall. Further work will address the identified issues, including creating a single-day reporting option, before commencing work to validate this new tool.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingExerciseAgedData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicUser-Computer Interfacedigital healthmeasurementolder adultsphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID33138167
PMCPMC7663633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.