Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138148›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Phenolic Compounds Obtained from

Paulo E S Munekata, Gema Nieto, Mirian Pateiro, José Manuel Lorenzo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. An Integrated Approach to Evaluate the Influence of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Spicing Up Meat Preservation:Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential Therapeutic Properties ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Bioactive Compounds from Fruits as Preservatives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo E S MunekataCentro Tecnolóxico da Carne de Galicia, rúa Galicia n◦ 4, Parque Tecnolóxico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.
Gema NietoDepartment of Food Technology, Nutrition and Food Science, Veterinary Faculty University of Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, 30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2349-2899
Mirian PateiroCentro Tecnolóxico da Carne de Galicia, rúa Galicia n◦ 4, Parque Tecnolóxico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9682-4594
José Manuel LorenzoCentro Tecnolóxico da Carne de Galicia, rúa Galicia n◦ 4, Parque Tecnolóxico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7725-9294
Centro Tecnológico de Automoción de Galicia · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers are interested in consuming clean label foods. Replacing synthetic additives with natural alternatives (especially sources rich in polyphenols) is a valid solution to produce and also preserve foods, especially meat and meat products.

Indexed as

antimicrobial activityhydroxytyrosolleaveslipid and protein oxidationoleupeinolive treepomacetyrosolwastewater

Identifiers

PMID33138148
PMCPMC7692586
OpenAlexW3095307732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.