Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138073›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

"

Zaina Mchome, Gerry Mshana, Diana Aloyce, Esther Peter, Donati Malibwa, Annapoorna Dwarumpudi, Saidi Kapiga, Heidi Stöckl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Women's Narratives about COVID-19, Preventive Practices and Sources of Information in Northwestern Tanzania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zaina MchomeMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, P.O. Box 11936 Mwanza, Tanzania.
Gerry MshanaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, P.O. Box 11936 Mwanza, Tanzania.
Diana AloyceMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, P.O. Box 11936 Mwanza, Tanzania.
Esther PeterMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, P.O. Box 11936 Mwanza, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-6434-8952
Donati MalibwaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, P.O. Box 11936 Mwanza, Tanzania.
Annapoorna DwarumpudiGender Violence and Health Centre, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Saidi KapigaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, P.O. Box 11936 Mwanza, Tanzania.
Heidi StöcklGender Violence and Health Centre, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0907-8483
Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate partner violence is a recognized public health and development issue that is consistently and comparatively measured through women's experience of physical and/or sexual acts by their partner. While physical intimate partner violence is covered by a wide range of behaviors, sexual intimate partner violence (SIPV) is often only measured through attempted or completed forced sex, ignoring less obvious forms of sexual intimate partner violence. We explored women's conceptualizations of SIPV by conducting in-depth interviews with 18 Tanzanian women. Using a thematic approach, we identified key features of women's sexual intimate relationships and their perceptions of them. The women clearly defined acts of positive sexual relationships that occurred with mutual consent and seduction and SIPV that included acts of forced sex and sex under the threat of violence. They also identified several acts that were crossing the line, whereby a discrepancy of views existed whether they constituted SIPV, such as having sex when out of the mood, sex being the duty of the wife, sex during the menses, requests for anal sex, having sex to not lose the husband, husband refusing sex and husband having other partners. Women in this study felt violated by a far wider range of sexual acts in their relationships. Future studies need to improve the measurement of sexual intimate partner violence to allow the collection of encompassing, yet comparable, data on this harmful phenomenon.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceAdultConcept FormationFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSexual BehaviorSexual HealthSexual PartnersTanzaniaintimate partner violencequalitative interviewssexual healthsexual violenceTanzania

Identifiers

PMID33138073
PMCPMC7662311
OpenAlexW3094691318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.