Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33138030›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Stakeholder Generated Ideas for Alternative School Food Provision Models in Australia Using the Nominal Group Technique.

Brittany J Johnson, Dorota Zarnowiecki, Claire L Hutchinson, Rebecca K Golley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Primary School Children's Views and Habits Around School Lunches.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brittany J JohnsonCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5492-9219
Dorota ZarnowieckiCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.
Claire L HutchinsonCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4289-8886
Rebecca K GolleyCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5197-7987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Good nutrition is important for children's learning, growth, and development, yet food intake during school hours does not align with recommendations. In Australia, most school children currently bring a packed lunch from home, but what if there was a different way? This project aimed to engage a diverse range of stakeholders to (1) generate, refine and prioritize ideas for novel models of food provision to Australian children within school hours, and (2) to determine and rank the potential barriers and facilitators to changing the school food provision system. This study used nominal group technique virtual workshops-three idea generation workshops (

Indexed as

FoodSchoolsStakeholder ParticipationAustraliaChildDietFood ServicesHumansLunchchildrenconsensus processfood servicelunch boxnominal group techniquenutritionnutrition promotionschool foodschool lunchesschool meals

Identifiers

PMID33138030
PMCPMC7663195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.