Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137897›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit's Experience with Implementing an In-Situ Simulation and Debriefing Patient Safety Program in the Setting of a Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Mary Eckels, Terry Zeilinger, Henry C Lee, Janine Bergin, Louis P Halamek, Nicole Yamada, Janene Fuerch, Ritu Chitkara, Jenny Quinn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary EckelsMaternal Newborn Services, St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA 92835, USA.
Terry ZeilingerMaternal Newborn Services, St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, CA 92835, USA.
Henry C LeeNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-1720
Janine BerginCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Louis P HalamekNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nicole YamadaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-8306
Janene FuerchNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ritu ChitkaraNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jenny QuinnCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC), Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital · USStanford Health Care · USSt. Jude Medical Center · US

Funding

NIH HHS 1R01HD087425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive neonatal resuscitation is a high acuity, low-frequency event accounting for approximately 1% of births. Neonatal resuscitation requires an interprofessional healthcare team to communicate and carry out tasks efficiently and effectively in a high adrenaline state. Implementing a neonatal patient safety simulation and debriefing program can help teams improve the behavioral, cognitive, and technical skills necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. In

Indexed as

collaborativedebriefingin-situ simulationneonatal intensive care unitneonatal simulationpatient safetyquality improvementsimulation

Identifiers

PMID33137897
PMCPMC7693971
OpenAlexW3097670902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.