Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137680›Full record

ReviewSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

The southern rural health and mortality penalty: A review of regional health inequities in the United States.

Charlotte E Miller, Ramachandran S Vasan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Disparities Across Race, Ethnicity, and Rurality Among Surgical Patients.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. "Sitting on the Porch Just Hearing the Crickets": Rural Living and Mental Well-Being Among Veterans in the U.S. South.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inpatient mortality following hip fracture in the United States: an updated analysis of over one million cases.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlotte E MillerBoston University School of Medicine, L510, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, United States. Electronic address: millerce@bu.edu.
Ramachandran S VasanBoston University School of Medicine, L510, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, United States. Electronic address: vasan@bu.edu.

Funding

RURAL: Risk Underlying Rural Areas Longitudinal Cohort StudyU01HL146382 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI JUDD, SUZANNE E, RAMACHANDRAN, VASAN · 2019 to 2025
$42.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL146382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rural-urban differences in morbidity and mortality across the United States have been well documented and termed the "rural mortality penalty". However, research studies frequently treat rural areas as homogeneous and often do not account for geospatial variability in rural health risks by both county, state, region, race, and sex within the United States. Additionally, people living in the rural South of the US have higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to both their urban counterparts and other rural areas. Of those living in southern rural communities, people of color experience higher rates of death and disease compared to white populations. Although there is a wealth of research that uses individual-level behaviors to explain rural-urban health disparities, there is less focus on how community and structural factors influence these differences. This review focuses on the "southern rural health penalty", a term coined by the authors, which refers to the high rate of mortality and morbidity in southern rural areas in the USA compared to both urban areas and non-southern rural places. We use macrosocial determinants of health to explain possible reasons for the "southern rural health penalty". This review can guide future research on rural health between southern and non-southern populations in the US and examine if macrosocial determinants of health can explain health disparities within southern rural populations.

Indexed as

Rural HealthRural PopulationHumansMorbidityUnited StatesUrban PopulationWhite PeopleMacrosocial determinants of healthRace-specific mortalityRegional health disparitiesRuralRural healthRural mortality penaltyU.S. south

Identifiers

PMID33137680
PMCPMC7755690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.