ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Bowel perforation during enema examination through a colostomy without leakage of contrast agent: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEnema examination is considered safe, but in rare cases, complications may result. Here, we report a rare case of iatrogenic bowel perforation during enema examination through a colostomy without leakage of contrast agent. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 36-year-old man who had undergone a sigmoid loop colostomy was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis. A bowel enema through a colostomy was performed by nurses and radiological technologists. During the procedure, a balloon catheter was inserted into the proximal lumen of the colostomy, and the balloon was inflated. The patient developed severe abdominal pain a few minutes following withdrawal of the catheter. Computed tomography showed intraperitoneal free air, although contrast agent leakage into the intraperitoneal cavity was not observed. The patient underwent emergency laparotomy. Intraoperatively, there was a 3-cm bowel perforation just inside the colostomy where the inflated balloon was pressing. DISCUSSION: The perforation site may have been sealed by the inflated balloon during the enema examination. In addition, the patient maintained a supine position during and after the examination. This led to contrast agent accumulating on the dorsal side and not leaking out from the perforation site after the balloon was deflated.
conclusionIatrogenic bowel perforation can occur without leakage of contrast agent during enema examination through a colostomy, and the examination should be performed under the supervision of an attending doctor. In the case of an enema examination through a colostomy, clinicians must be aware of the possibility of bowel perforation even if leakage of contrast agent is not observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.