Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137667›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020

Rerouting of the pectoralis major muscle for breast animation deformity in sub-pectoral autologous breast reconstruction: A case report and review of the literature.

Ennie Bijkerk, Tiara R Lopez Penha, René R W J van der Hulst, Stefania M H Tuinder

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ennie BijkerkDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Tiara R Lopez PenhaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
René R W J van der HulstDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Stefania M H TuinderDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: s.tuinder@mumc.nl.
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast animation deformity (BAD) is a known complication of sub-pectoral implant placement that is usually corrected by simply repositioning the implant to a pre-pectoral position. However, when this complication occurs in the case of a sub-pectorally placed free-flap, the solution becomes a lot less straightforward: repositioning of the flap carries the risk of possible damage to the pedicle. In order to avoid having to re-do the anastomoses we opted for a rerouting of the pectoralis major muscle around the vascular anastomoses. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a 26-year old patient with unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes of her bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. The flaps were placed sub-pectorally, in the already existing pocket that was created during her first breast reconstruction with silicone implants, resulting in severe BAD. Repositioning the free flap from the sub-pectoral to the pre-pectoral plane allowed for reinsertion of the pectoralis major muscle to its anatomical position without jeopardizing the vascular anastomoses. The patient was satisfied with the increased projection of the breasts. DISCUSSION: Changing the plane from sub-pectoral to pre-pectoral remains the best treatment option for patients experiencing BAD. In combination with an acellular dermal matrix, this would have been a good option for our patient. However, when choosing to perform autologous breast reconstruction instead, our recommendation would be to always place the flap in the pre-pectoral plane to avoid BAD.

conclusionThe report shows that the plane of a flap can be successfully changed without jeopardizing the pedicle of the flap.

Indexed as

Breast animation deformityBreast reconstructionDIEP flapPectoralis major muscleReinsertion

Identifiers

PMID33137667
PMCPMC7610019
OpenAlexW3093833200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.