Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137515›Full record

ArticlePulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics2020

Advanced spray dried proliposomes of amphotericin B lung surfactant-mimic phospholipid microparticles/nanoparticles as dry powder inhalers for targeted pulmonary drug delivery.

Alexan I Gomez, Maria F Acosta, Priya Muralidharan, Jason X-J Yuan, Stephen M Black, Don Hayes, Heidi M Mansour

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexan I GomezThe University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Dept of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona College of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Translational & Regenerative Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Maria F AcostaThe University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Dept of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Priya MuralidharanThe University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Dept of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jason X-J YuanThe University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Translational & Regenerative Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Stephen M BlackThe University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Translational & Regenerative Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Lung Vascular Pathobiology, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Don HayesThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, Lung and Heart-Lung Transplant Programs, Columbus, AZ, USA; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, The Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Heidi M MansourThe University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Dept of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Translational & Regenerative Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona, Institute of the Environment, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona, BIO5 Research Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA; The University of Arizona, National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA. Electronic address: mansour@pharmacy.arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · USLung Institute · US

Funding

Perinatal NO signaling in congenital heart diseaseR01HL137282 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BLACK, STEPHEN M, FINEMAN, JEFFREY R · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design, develop and characterize inhalable proliposomal microparticles/nanoparticles of Amphotericin B (AmB) with synthetic phospholipids, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol (DPPG) which are lung surfactant-mimic phospholipids. Organic solutions of AmB and phospholipids, were co-spray dried using an advanced closed-mode system and a high performance cyclone. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to visualize the surface structure, morphology, and particles size. The residual water content of the proliposomes was quantified by Karl Fisher coulometric titration (KFT). Degree of crystallinity/non-crystallinity was measured by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD). Phase behavior was measured by differential scanning calorimetry. The chemical composition by molecular fingerprinting was established using attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The amount of AmB loaded into the proliposomes was quantified using UV-VIS spectroscopy. The in vitro aerosol dispersion performance was conducted using the Next Generation Impactor (NGI) and the human dry powder inhaler (DPI) (Handihaler®) that is FDA-approved. Different human lung cell lines were employed to demonstrate in vitro safety as a function of dose and formulation. Smooth, spherical microparticles/nanoparticles were formed at medium and high spray drying pump rates and had low residual water content. A characteristic peak in the XRPD diffraction pattern as well as an endotherm in DSC confirmed the presence of the lipid bilayer structure characteristic in the DPPC/DPPG proliposomal systems. Superior in vitro aerosol performance was achieved with engineered microparticles/nanoparticles demonstrating suitability for targeted pulmonary drug delivery as inhalable dry powders. The in vitro cellular studies demonstrated that the formulated proliposomes are safe. These AmB proliposomes can be a better option for targeted treatment of severe pulmonary fungal infections.

Indexed as

Dry Powder InhalersNanoparticlesAdministration, InhalationAerosolsAmphotericin BHumansLungParticle SizePhospholipidsPowdersSurface-Active AgentsAerosolsAmphotericin BPhospholipidsPowdersSurface-Active AgentsCo-spray drying particle engineeringHuman inhaler deviceIn vitro aerosol dispersionIn vitro human pulmonary cell viabilityLung surfactant phospholipidsPulmonary drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID33137515
PMCPMC8923534
OpenAlexW3096326784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.