Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137479›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Decoding visual information from high-density diffuse optical tomography neuroimaging data.

Kalyan Tripathy, Zachary E Markow, Andrew K Fishell, Arefeh Sherafati, Tracy M Burns-Yocum, Mariel L Schroeder, Alexandra M Svoboda, Adam T Eggebrecht, Mark A Anastasio, Bradley L Schlaggar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Encoding Taste: From Receptors to Perception.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kalyan TripathyDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: tripathyk@wustl.edu.
Zachary E MarkowDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Andrew K FishellDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Arefeh SherafatiDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Tracy M Burns-YocumDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Mariel L SchroederDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Alexandra M SvobodaDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Adam T EggebrechtDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Mark A AnastasioDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Bradley L SchlaggarKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joseph P CulverDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Couch Biomedical Research Building, 4515 McKinley Avenue, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

High-Sensitivity DOT for Mapping Human Brain FunctionR01NS090874 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CULVER, JOSEPH P · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Cortical Network Modulation by Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain StimulationR01NS109487 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CULVER, JOSEPH P, HERSHEY, TAMARA G · 2019 to 2024
$2.9M
Wireless High-Density Diffuse Optical Tomography for Decoding Brain ActivityU01EB027005 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CULVER, JOSEPH P · 2018 to 2021
$2.7M
Illuminating development of infant and toddler brainfunction with DOTR01MH122751 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EGGEBRECHT, ADAM THOMAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
IMAGING BRAIN FUNCTION IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS WITH DIFFUSE OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHYK01MH103594 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EGGEBRECHT, ADAM THOMAS · 2015 to 2019
$708k
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB027005NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH103594NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122751NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090874NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeural decoding could be useful in many ways, from serving as a neuroscience research tool to providing a means of augmented communication for patients with neurological conditions. However, applications of decoding are currently constrained by the limitations of traditional neuroimaging modalities. Electrocorticography requires invasive neurosurgery, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is too cumbersome for uses like daily communication, and alternatives like functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offer poor image quality. High-density diffuse optical tomography (HD-DOT) is an emerging modality that uses denser optode arrays than fNIRS to combine logistical advantages of optical neuroimaging with enhanced image quality. Despite the resulting promise of HD-DOT for facilitating field applications of neuroimaging, decoding of brain activity as measured by HD-DOT has yet to be evaluated.

objectiveTo assess the feasibility and performance of decoding with HD-DOT in visual cortex. METHODS AND

resultsTo establish the feasibility of decoding at the single-trial level with HD-DOT, a template matching strategy was used to decode visual stimulus position. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to quantify the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of binary visual decoding. Mean areas under the curve (AUCs) greater than 0.97 across 10 imaging sessions in a highly sampled participant were observed. ROC analyses of decoding across 5 participants established both reproducibility in multiple individuals and the feasibility of inter-individual decoding (mean AUCs > 0.7), although decoding performance varied between individuals. Phase-encoded checkerboard stimuli were used to assess more complex, non-binary decoding with HD-DOT. Across 3 highly sampled participants, the phase of a 60° wide checkerboard wedge rotating 10° per second through 360° was decoded with a within-participant error of 25.8±24.7°. Decoding between participants was also feasible based on permutation-based significance testing.

conclusionsVisual stimulus information can be decoded accurately, reproducibly, and across a range of detail (for both binary and non-binary outcomes) at the single-trial level (without needing to block-average test data) using HD-DOT data. These results lay the foundation for future studies of more complex decoding with HD-DOT and applications in clinical populations.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedTomography, OpticalVisual PerceptionDecodingFunctional neuroimagingHigh-density diffuse optical tomographyRetinotopy

Identifiers

PMID33137479
PMCPMC8006181
OpenAlexW3096866319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.