Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137372›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2021

Toward Biotherapeutics Formulation Composition Engineering using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS).

Sandeep Somani, Sunhwan Jo, Renuka Thirumangalathu, Danika Rodrigues, Laura M Tanenbaum, Ketan Amin, Alexander D MacKerell, Santosh V Thakkar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. How can we discover developable antibody-based biotherapeutics?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Computer-Aided Drug Design: An Update.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandeep SomaniDiscovery Sciences, Janssen Research and Development (Janssen R&D), Spring House, PA 19477, USA.
Sunhwan JoSilcsBio LLC, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA.
Renuka ThirumangalathuBioTherapeutics Drug Product Development (BioTD DPD), Janssen Research and Development (Janssen R&D), Malvern, PA 19355, USA.
Danika RodriguesBioTherapeutics Drug Product Development (BioTD DPD), Janssen Research and Development (Janssen R&D), Malvern, PA 19355, USA.
Laura M TanenbaumBioTherapeutics Drug Product Development (BioTD DPD), Janssen Research and Development (Janssen R&D), Malvern, PA 19355, USA.
Ketan AminBioTherapeutics Drug Product Development (BioTD DPD), Janssen Research and Development (Janssen R&D), Malvern, PA 19355, USA.
Alexander D MacKerellSilcsBio LLC, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA; Computer-Aided Drug Design Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: alex@silcsbio.com.
Santosh V ThakkarBioTherapeutics Drug Product Development (BioTD DPD), Janssen Research and Development (Janssen R&D), Malvern, PA 19355, USA; BioTherapeutics Cell and Developability Sciences (BioTD CDS), Janssen Research and Development (Janssen R&D), Spring House, PA 19477, USA. Electronic address: sthakka4@its.jnj.com.
Janssen (United States) · USSilcsBio (United States) · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Computational methods for optimized biologics formulationR44GM130198 · NIGMS · SILCSBIO, LLC · PI KOGNOLE, ABHISHEK ANIL, MACKERELL, ALEXANDER D · 2021 to 2022
$1.8M
Computational Methods for Optimizing Biologics FormulationR43GM130198 · NIGMS · SILCSBIO, LLC · PI JO, SUNHWAN, MACKERELL, ALEXANDER D · 2019 to 2019
$225k
NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM130198NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM130198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formulation of protein-based therapeutics employ advanced formulation and analytical technologies for screening various parameters such as buffer, pH, and excipients. At a molecular level, physico-chemical properties of a protein formulation depend on self-interaction between protein molecules, protein-solvent and protein-excipient interactions. This work describes a novel in silico approach, SILCS-Biologics, for structure-based modeling of protein formulations. SILCS Biologics is based on the Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) technology and enables modeling of interactions among different components of a formulation at an atomistic level while accounting for protein flexibility. It predicts potential hotspot regions on the protein surface for protein-protein and protein-excipient interactions. Here we apply SILCS-Biologics on a Fab domain of a monoclonal antibody (mAbN) to model Fab-Fab interactions and interactions with three amino acid excipients, namely, arginine HCl, proline and lysine HCl. Experiments on 100 mg/ml formulations of mAbN showed that arginine increased, lysine reduced, and proline did not impact viscosity. We use SILCS-Biologics modeling to explore a structure-based hypothesis for the viscosity modulating effect of these excipients. Current efforts are aimed at further validation of this novel computational framework and expanding the scope to model full mAb and other protein therapeutics.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsProteinsComputer SimulationLigandsAmino AcidsLigandsProteinsArginineExcipientFlexibilityFormulationFragMapsHigh-concentrationIn silico modelingInteractionLysineMolecular dynamicsProlineProteinScreeningViscosity

Identifiers

PMID33137372
PMCPMC7897284
OpenAlexW3096658591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.