Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137196›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020

Comparison of Sigma 1 Receptor Ligands SA4503 and PRE084 to (+)-Pentazocine in the rd10 Mouse Model of RP.

Jing Wang, Haiyan Xiao, Shannon R Barwick, Sylvia B Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sigma 1 Receptor and Its Pivotal Role in Neurological Disorders.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing WangDepartment of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States.
Haiyan XiaoDepartment of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States.
Shannon R BarwickDepartment of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States.
Sylvia B SmithDepartment of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, United States.
Discovery Institute · USAugusta University · US

Funding

Module 3: Gene Expression/ProteomicsP30EY031631 · NEI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI Xingjun Fan · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
Sigma 1 Receptor: a novel therapeutic target for retinal degenerationR01EY028103 · NEI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, SYLVIA B. · 2017 to 2019
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY031631NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Sigma 1 receptor is a novel therapeutic target for retinal disease. Its activation, using a high-affinity, high-specificity ligand (+)-pentazocine ((+)-PTZ), rescues photoreceptor cells in the rd10 mouse model of RP. Here, we asked whether the robust retinal neuroprotective properties of (+)-PTZ are generalizable to SA4503 and PRE084, two other high-affinity sigma 1 receptor ligands. Methods: We treated 661W cells with SA4503 or PRE084. Cell viability, oxidative stress, and expression of Nrf2 and NRF2-regulated antioxidant genes (Nqo1, Cat, and Sod1) were assessed. Rd10 mice were administered SA4503 (1 mg/kg), PRE084 (0.5 mg/kg), or (+)-PTZ (0.5 mg/kg). Visual acuity, retinal architecture, and retinal electrophysiologic function were measured in vivo and retinal structure was assessed histologically. Results: Similar to (+)-PTZ, SA4503 and PRE084 improved cell viability, attenuated oxidative stress, and increased Nrf2, Nqo1 and Cat expression. Although treatment of rd10 mice with (+)-PTZ improved visual acuity, increased outer retinal thickness, and improved photopic a- and b-wave responses compared with nontreated rd10 mice, treatment with SA4503 or PRE084 did not. The number of photoreceptor nuclei/100 µm retinal length in SA4503- and PRE084-treated rd10 mice (approximately 11/100) did not differ significantly from nontreated rd10 mice, whereas (+)-PTZ-treated mice had significantly more nuclei (approximately 22/100 µm). Conclusions: Cell survival and gene regulation experiments yielded similar outcomes when SA4503, PRE084, or (+)-PTZ were conducted in vitro, however neither SA4503 or PRE084 afforded in vivo protection in the severe rd10 retinopathy model comparable to (+)-PTZ. Despite all three compounds demonstrating the potential to activate sigma 1 receptor, the retinal neuroprotective properties of the three ligands differ significantly.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCatalaseCell LineCell SurvivalElectroretinographyGene Expression RegulationLigandsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMorpholinesNAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)Nootropic AgentsOxidative StressPentazocinePiperazines2-(4-morpholino)ethyl-1-phenylcyclohexane-1-carboxylateCatalaseLigandsMorpholinesNAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)Nootropic AgentsNqo1 protein, mousePentazocinePiperazinesReceptors, sigmaSA 4503Sigma-1 ReceptorSuperoxide Dismutase-1

Identifiers

PMID33137196
PMCPMC7645203
OpenAlexW3096688043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.