Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33137135›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Prevalence and predictors of uterine rupture among Ethiopian women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Melaku Desta, Haile Amha, Keralem Anteneh Bishaw, Fentahun Adane, Moges Agazhe Assemie, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Nigus Bililign Yimer

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Public health action · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melaku DestaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-4955-2346
Haile AmhaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Keralem Anteneh BishawDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Fentahun AdaneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-6490-0743
Moges Agazhe AssemieDepartment of Public health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0380-834X
Getiye Dejenu KibretDepartment of Public health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Nigus Bililign YimerDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Debre Markos University · ETWoldia University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine rupture has a significant public health importance, contributing to 13% of maternal mortality and 74%-92% of perinatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, and 36% of maternal mortality in Ethiopia. The prevalence and predictors of uterine rupture were highly variable and inconclusive across studies in the country. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and predictor of uterine rupture in Ethiopia.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 checklist. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online databases were searched. The Newcastle- Ottawa quality assessment tool was used for critical appraisal. I2 statistic and Egger's tests were used to assess the heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively. The random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence and odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval.

resultsSixteen studies were included, with a total of 91,784 women in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of uterine rupture was 2% (95% CI: 1.99, 3.01). The highest prevalence was observed in the Amhara regional state (5%) and the lowest was in Tigray region (1%). Previous cesarean delivery (OR = 9.95, 95% CI: 3.09, 32.0), lack of antenatal care visit (OR = 8.40, 95% CI: 4.5, 15.7), rural residence (OR = 4.75, 95% CI: 1.17, 19.3), grand multiparity (OR = 4.49, 95% CI: 2.83, 7.11) and obstructed labor (OR = 6.75, 95%CI: 1.92, 23.8) were predictors of uterine rupture.

conclusionUterine rupture is still high in Ethiopia. Therefore, proper auditing on the appropriateness of cesarean section and proper labor monitoring, improving antenatal care visit, and birth preparedness and complication readiness plan are needed. Moreover, early referral and family planning utilization are the recommended interventions to reduce the burden of uterine rupture among Ethiopia women.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionEthiopiaFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CarePrevalenceRisk FactorsRural PopulationUterine Rupture

Identifiers

PMID33137135
PMCPMC7605683
OpenAlexW3095573811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.